ArticleJournal of anesthesia2014
Pain research in Africa: a ten-year bibliometric survey.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Prevalence of Chronic Pain in Children and Adolescents From 2009 to 2023.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2025Review
- Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review of the Current Situation of Postoperative Pain and Causes of Inadequate Pain Management in Africa.Journal of pain research · 2023Review
- An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Living with Chronic Low Back Pain in Ethiopia.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Scientometric overview of nursing research on pain management.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2018Article
- Worldwide research productivity on tramadol: a bibliometric analysis.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOver the years, a trend for very low numbers of scientific publications from Africa has emerged. There has been no evaluation of pain research publications from this region. This study was conducted to determine the African pain research spectrum over the last 10 years, to identify trends in the number of publications from different countries, to identify currently underexplored areas of pain research, and to stimulate renewed interest in quality pain research in Nigeria and Africa.
methodsThe English- and non-English-language medical literature on pain from July 2002 to May 2012 was studied using Medline, the Ovid database, and by performing hand searches of relevant references using Google. Publications on pain by Africans and/or non-Africans conducted in Africa on Africans living in Africa within the study period were included. The total number of articles per country, publication types, and impact factors of the respective journals were tabulated to determine the quantity and quality of research in this field.
resultsTwo hundred twenty-eight (228) articles from 25 African countries that were published in 129 different journals were identified. The majority were epidemiological studies (43.9 %), experimental studies (20.2 %), randomized controlled trials (2.2 %), and systematic reviews (1.8 %). Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda topped the list of the most-published articles, with 76 (33.3 %), 71 (31.1 %), and 12 (5.3 %), respectively. The total number of journals with impact factors was 81, of which 29 were high-impact-factor journals.
conclusionPain research publications from Africa should be encouraged. Given the underexplored frontiers of pain research, there is a need to engage in rigorous research in this field to enhance the contribution of the African continent ("the African Voice") to worldwide advances in this respect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24375219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.