Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24375103›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

Spore germination mediated by Bacillus megaterium QM B1551 SleL and YpeB.

Fatma Işik Ūstok, Len C Packman, Christopher R Lowe, Graham Christie

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma Işik ŪstokInstitute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Len C Packman
Christopher R Lowe
Graham Christie
University of Cambridge · GBMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work demonstrated that Bacillus megaterium QM B1551 spores that are null for the sleB and cwlJ genes, which encode cortex-lytic enzymes (CLEs), either of which is required for efficient cortex hydrolysis in Bacillus spores, could germinate efficiently when complemented with a plasmid-borne copy of ypeB plus the nonlytic portion of sleB encoding the N-terminal domain of SleB (sleB(N)). The current study demonstrates that the defective germination phenotype of B. megaterium sleB cwlJ spores can partially be restored when they are complemented with plasmid-borne ypeB alone. However, efficient germination in this genetic background requires the presence of sleL, which in this species was suggested previously to encode a nonlytic epimerase. Recombinant B. megaterium SleL showed little, or no, activity against purified spore sacculi, cortical fragments, or decoated spore substrates. However, analysis of muropeptides generated by the combined activities of recombinant SleB and SleL against spore sacculi revealed that B. megaterium SleL is actually an N-acetylglucosaminidase, albeit with apparent reduced activity compared to that of the homologous Bacillus cereus protein. Additionally, decoated spores were induced to release a significant proportion of dipicolinic acid (DPA) from the spore core when incubated with recombinant SleL plus YpeB, although optimal DPA release required the presence of endogenous CLEs. The physiological basis that underpins this newly identified dependency between SleL and YpeB is not clear, since pulldown assays indicated that the proteins do not interact physically in vitro.

Indexed as

Bacillus megateriumBacterial ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHydrolysisSpores, BacterialBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24375103
PMCPMC3957701
OpenAlexW2155465889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.