ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2014
ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASNC model coverage policy: 2023 cardiac positron emission tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Quality metrics for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: an ASNC information statement.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Optimal Protocol of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Reduction of Radiation Exposure.Annals of nuclear cardiology · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the impact of laboratory accreditation on downstream outcomes.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Can we tell the results without doing the test?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- The Radiologist as a Gatekeeper in Chest Pain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Appropriate utilization of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of stable coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- High-frequency QRS analysis to supplement ST evaluation in exercise stress electrocardiography: Incremental diagnostic accuracy and net reclassification.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system polymorphisms on myocardial perfusion: Correlations with myocardial single photon emission computed tomography-derived parameters.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Do we need diagnostic strategies enhanced with genetic information for ischemic heart disease?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Article
- Case Presentation Commentary on "Deciding wisely: A case for an effective use of myocardial perfusion imaging".Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Status of cardiovascular PET radiation exposure and strategies for reduction: An Information Statement from the Cardiovascular PET Task Force.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
- Routine CT angiography to detect severe coronary artery disease prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2017Article
- Coronary artery calcium scanning in symptomatic patients: Ready for use as a gatekeeper for further testing?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
- Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016Review
- Appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Are they appropriate for women?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016Article
- Effect of changes in perfusion defect size during serial regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016Article
- Costs and clinical outcomes for non-invasive versus invasive diagnostic approaches to patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Article
- Coronary artery calcium score and CT angiography in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease.Japanese journal of radiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American College of Cardiology Foundation along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriate use review of common clinical presentations for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) to consider use of stress testing and anatomic diagnostic procedures. This document reflects an updating of the prior Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) published for radionuclide imaging (RNI), stress echocardiography (Echo), calcium scoring, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and invasive coronary angiography for SIHD. This is in keeping with the commitment to revise and refine the AUC on a frequent basis. A major innovation in this document is the rating of tests side by side for the same indication. The side-by-side rating removes any concerns about differences in indication or interpretation stemming from prior use of separate documents for each test. However, the ratings were explicitly not competitive rankings due to the limited availability of comparative evidence, patient variability, and range of capabilities available in any given local setting. The indications for this review are limited to the detection and risk assessment of SIHD and were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Eighty clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate rating panel on a scale of 1-9, to designate Appropriate, May Be Appropriate, or Rarely Appropriate use following a modified Delphi process following the recently updated AUC development methodology. The use of some modalities of testing in the initial evaluation of patients with symptoms representing ischemic equivalents, newly diagnosed heart failure, arrhythmias, and syncope was generally found to be Appropriate or May Be Appropriate, except in cases where low pre-test probability or low risk limited the benefit of most testing except exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). Testing for the evaluation of new or worsening symptoms following a prior test or procedure was found to be Appropriate. In addition, testing was found to be Appropriate or May Be Appropriate for patients within 90 days of an abnormal or uncertain prior result. Pre-operative testing was rated Appropriate or May Be Appropriate only for patients who had poor functional capacity and were undergoing vascular or intermediate risk surgery with 1 or more clinical risk factors or an organ transplant. The exercise ECG was suggested as an Appropriate test for cardiac rehabilitation clearance or for exercise prescription purposes. Testing in asymptomatic patients was generally found to be Rarely Appropriate, except for calcium scoring and exercise testing in intermediate and high-risk individuals and either stress or anatomic imaging in higher-risk individuals, which were all rated as May Be Appropriate. All modalities of follow-up testing after a prior test or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 2 years and within 5 years after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the absence of new symptoms were rated Rarely Appropriate. Pre-operative testing for patients with good functional capacity, prior normal testing within 1 year, or prior to low-risk surgery also were found to be Rarely Appropriate. Imaging for an exercise prescription or prior to the initiation of cardiac rehabilitation was Rarely Appropriate except for cardiac rehabilitation clearance for heart failure patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24374980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.