Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24374942›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2014

The effect of bariatric surgery on intestinal absorption and transit time.

Kirstin A Carswell, Royce P Vincent, Ajay P Belgaumkar, Roy A Sherwood, Stephanie A Amiel, Ameet G Patel, Carel W le Roux

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Intestinal Calcium Absorption Decreases Dramatically After Gastric Bypass Surgery Despite Optimization of Vitamin D Status.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2015
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The implication of gut microbiota in recovery from gastrointestinal surgery.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kirstin A CarswellDepartment of General Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK, SE5 9RS, kirstincarswell@hotmail.com.
Royce P Vincent
Ajay P Belgaumkar
Roy A Sherwood
Stephanie A Amiel
Ameet G Patel
Carel W le Roux
King's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J006742/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgical procedures are classified by their presumed mechanisms of action: restrictive, malabsorptive or a combination of both. However, this dogma is questionable and remains unproven. We investigated post-operative changes in nutrient absorption and transit time following bariatric surgery.

methodsParticipants were recruited into four groups: obese controls (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, n = 7), adjustable gastric banding (n = 6), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 7) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS, n = 5). Participants underwent sulphasalazine/sulphapyridine tests (oro-caecal transit time); fasting plasma citrulline (functional enterocyte mass); 3 days faecal collection for faecal elastase 1 (FE-1); calprotectin (FCp); faecal fatty acids (pancreatic exocrine function, gut inflammation and fat excretion, respectively); and 5 h D-xylose, L-rhamnose and lactulose test (intestinal absorption and permeability).

resultsAge and gender were not different but BMI differed between groups (p = 0.001). No difference in oro-caecal transit time (p = 0.935) or functional enterocyte mass (p = 0.819) was detected. FCp was elevated post-RYGB vs. obese (p = 0.016) and FE-1 was reduced post-RYGB vs. obese (p = 0.002). Faecal fat concentrations were increased post-DS vs. obese (p = 0.038) and RYGB (p = 0.024) and were also higher post-RYGB vs. obese (p = 0.033). Urinary excretion of D-xylose and L-rhamnose was not different between the groups; however, lactulose/rhamnose ratio was elevated post-DS vs. other groups (all p < 0.02), suggesting increased intestinal permeability.

conclusionsFollowing RYGB, there are surprisingly few abnormalities or indications of severe malabsorption of fats or sugars. Small bowel adaptation after bariatric surgery may be key to understanding the mechanisms responsible for the beneficial metabolic effects of these operations.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrointestinal TransitIntestinal AbsorptionAdultBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleGastric BypassGastrointestinal TractGastroplastyHumansIntestinal MucosaLactuloseMaleMiddle AgedLactuloseRhamnoseXylose

Identifiers

PMID24374942
OpenAlexW2089923976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.