ArticleBiophysical chemistry2014
Reduction of the C191-C220 disulfide of α-chymotrypsinogen A reduces nucleation barriers for aggregation.
Article in Biophysical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultra-rapid glutathionylation of chymotrypsinogen in its molten globule-like conformation: A comparison to archaeal proteins.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Protein-protein interactions in dilute to concentrated solutions: α-chymotrypsinogen in acidic conditions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Proper disulfide formation can be essential for the conformational stability of natively folded proteins. For proteins that must unfold in order to aggregate, disruption of native disulfides may therefore promote aggregation. This study characterizes differences in the aggregation process for wild-type (WT) α-chymostrypsinogen A (aCgn) and the same molecule with one of its native disulfides (C191-C220) reduced to free thiols (aCgnSH) at acidic pH, where WT aCgn forms semi-flexible amyloid polymers. Loss of the disulfide leads to no discernable differences in folded monomer secondary or tertiary structure based on circular dichroism (CD) or intrinsic fluorescence (FL), and causes a small decrease in the free energy change upon unfolding. After unfolding-mediated aggregation, the resulting amyloid morphology and structure are similar or indistinguishable for aCgn and aCgnSH by CD, FL, ThT binding, multi-angle laser light scattering, and transmission electron microscopy. Aggregates of aCgn and aCgnSH are also able to cross-seed with monomers of the other species. However, aggregates of aCgnSH are more resistive than aCgn aggregates to urea-mediated dissociation, suggesting some degree of structural differences in the aggregated species that was not resolvable in detail without higher resolution methods. Mechanistic analyses of aggregation kinetics indicate that the initiation or nucleation of new aggregates from aCgnSH involves a mono-molecular rate limiting step, possibly the unfolding step. In contrast, that for aCgn involves an oligomeric intermediate, suggesting native disulfide linkages help to hinder non-native protein aggregation by providing conformational barriers to key nucleation event(s).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.