Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24374132›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2014

Opposing effects of D-cycloserine on fear despite a common extinction duration: interactions between brain regions and behavior.

Scott S Bolkan, K Matthew Lattal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. State-of-the-art and future directions for extinction as a translational model for fear and anxiety.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott S BolkanDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, United States.
K Matthew LattalDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, United States. Electronic address: lattalm@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Behavioral and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Extinction of Cocaine-Induced MemoriesR01DA025922 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LATTAL, K MATTHEW, WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2008 to 2018
$5.1M
Temporal factors in extinction and spontaneous recoveryR01MH077111 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LATTAL, K MATTHEW · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025922NIMH NIH HHS MH077111NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of studies have reported that D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor, can facilitate the loss of conditioned fear if it is administered during an extinction trial. Here we examine the effects of DCS injected into the hippocampus or amygdala on extinction of context-evoked freezing after contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice. We find that DCS administered prior to an extinction session decreased freezing from the outset of the session regardless of which brain region was targeted. Retention tests revealed opposite effects on fear expression despite identical behavioral treatments: intra-hippocampal DCS inhibited fear expression while intra-amygdala DCS potentiated fear expression. Following post-extinction session injections of DCS, we found a similar though less pronounced effect. Closer inspection of the data revealed that the effects of DCS interacted with the behavior of the subjects during extinction. Intra-hippocampal injections of DCS enhanced extinction in those mice that showed the greatest amount of within-session extinction, but had less pronounced effects on mice that showed the least within-session extinction. Intra-amygdala injections of DCS impaired extinction in those mice that showed the least within-session extinction, but there was some evidence that the effect in the amygdala did not depend on behavior during extinction. These findings demonstrate that even with identical extinction trial durations, the effects of DCS administered into the hippocampus and amygdala can heavily depend on the organism's behavior during the extinction session. The broader implication of these findings is that the effects of pharmacological treatments designed to enhance extinction by targeting hippocampal or amygdalar processes may depend on the responsivity of the subject to the behavioral treatment.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsAntibiotics, AntitubercularConditioning, ClassicalCycloserineExtinction, PsychologicalFearFreezing Reaction, CatalepticHippocampusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTime FactorsAntibiotics, AntitubercularCycloserineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAmygdalaConsolidationd-CycloserineExtinctionFearHippocampusReconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID24374132
PMCPMC4053504
OpenAlexW2019725327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.