Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24373307›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2014

Effect of reduced dose schedules and intramuscular injection of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunological response and safety profile: a randomized trial.

Jennifer G Wright, Brian D Plikaytis, Charles E Rose, Scott D Parker, Janiine Babcock, Wendy Keitel, Hana El Sahly, Gregory A Poland, Robert M Jacobson, Harry L Keyserling and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00119067 (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00119067 phase4completednot on this map

Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed: Human Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial to Address Change in Route of Administration and Dose Reduction

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2002 to 2010Enrolled1,564ConditionsHealthyArmsAnthrax Vaccine Adsorbed, Saline injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Use of Anthrax Vaccine in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Recombinant full-lengthFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  7. Subcutaneous vaccine administration - an outmoded practice.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jennifer G WrightCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States. Electronic address: jgwright@cdc.gov.
Brian D PlikaytisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Charles E RoseCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Scott D ParkerAlabama Vaccine Research Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 908 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-2050, United States.
Janiine BabcockWalter Reed Army Institute for Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Springs, MD 20910-7500, United States.
Wendy KeitelDepartments of Molecular Virology & Microbiology and Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Hana El SahlyDepartments of Molecular Virology & Microbiology and Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Gregory A PolandMayo Clinic and Foundation, 611C Guggenheim Building, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Robert M JacobsonMayo Clinic and Foundation, 611C Guggenheim Building, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Harry L KeyserlingEmory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Vera A SemenovaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Han LiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Jarad SchifferCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Hanan DababnehCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Sandra K MartinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Stacey W MartinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Nina MaranoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Nancy E MessonnierCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.
Conrad P QuinnCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated an alternative administration route, reduced schedule priming series, and increased intervals between booster doses for anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA). AVA's originally licensed schedule was 6 subcutaneous (SQ) priming injections administered at months (m) 0, 0.5, 1, 6, 12 and 18 with annual boosters; a simpler schedule is desired.

methodsThrough a multicenter randomized, double blind, non-inferiority Phase IV human clinical trial, the originally licensed schedule was compared to four alternative and two placebo schedules. 8-SQ group participants received 6 SQ injections with m30 and m42 "annual" boosters; participants in the 8-IM group received intramuscular (IM) injections according to the same schedule. Reduced schedule groups (7-IM, 5-IM, 4-IM) received IM injections at m0, m1, m6; at least one of the m0.5, m12, m18, m30 vaccine doses were replaced with saline. All reduced schedule groups received a m42 booster. Post-injection blood draws were taken two to four weeks following injection. Non-inferiority of the alternative schedules was compared to the 8-SQ group at m2, m7, and m43. Reactogenicity outcomes were proportions of injection site and systemic adverse events (AEs).

resultsThe 8-IM group's m2 response was non-inferior to the 8-SQ group for the three primary endpoints of anti-protective antigen IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC), geometric mean titer, and proportion of responders with a 4-fold rise in titer. At m7 anti-PA IgG GMCs for the three reduced dosage groups were non-inferior to the 8-SQ group GMCs. At m43, 8-IM, 5-IM, and 4-IM group GMCs were superior to the 8-SQ group. Solicited injection site AEs occurred at lower proportions in the IM group compared to SQ. Route of administration did not influence the occurrence of systemic AEs. A 3 dose IM priming schedule with doses administered at m0, m1, and m6 elicited long term immunological responses and robust immunological memory that was efficiently stimulated by a single booster vaccination at 42 months.

conclusionsA priming series of 3 intramuscular doses administered at m0, m1, and m6 with a triennial booster was non-inferior to more complex schedules for achieving antibody response.

Indexed as

Immunization, SecondaryAdultAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntibody FormationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntramuscularMaleMiddle AgedAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin Gadverse eventAdverse eventsAEanthrax vaccine adsorbedAnthrax Vaccine Research ProgramAnthrax vaccinesAVAAVRPBacillus anthracisBacterial vaccinesCDCCenters for Disease Control and PreventionDepartment of DefenseDoDFDAFood and Drug AdministrationGCPGood Clinical PracticesIMINDintramuscularlyInvestigational New Druglethal toxinLTxPAprotective antigenSQsubcutaneousUnited States Army Medical Materiel AgencyUSAMMAVaccination

Identifiers

PMID24373307
PMCPMC9067390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.