Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24372937›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2014

A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a brief cannabis universal prevention program among adolescents in primary care.

Maureen A Walton, Stella Resko, Kristen L Barry, Stephen T Chermack, Robert A Zucker, Marc A Zimmerman, Brenda M Booth, Frederic C Blow

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brief Drug Interventions Delivered in General Medical Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cannabis Use Outcomes.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Pediatrician and Behavioral Clinician-Delivered Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment: Substance Use and Depression Outcomes.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Accelerating Solutions for the Overdose Crisis: an Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Protocol for the HEAL Prevention Cooperative.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maureen A WaltonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stella Resko
Kristen L Barry
Stephen T Chermack
Robert A Zucker
Marc A Zimmerman
Brenda M Booth
Frederic C Blow
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · USHealth Services Research & Development · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Tailored Youth Drug Intervention in Primary CareR01DA020075 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLOW, FREDERIC C · 2005 to 2009
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA020075NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine the efficacy of a brief intervention delivered by a therapist (TBI) or a computer (CBI) in preventing cannabis use among adolescents in urban primary care clinics.

designA randomized controlled trial comparing: CBI and TBI versus control.

settingUrban primary care clinics in the United States.

participantsResearch staff recruited 714 adolescents (aged 12-18 years) who reported no life-time cannabis use on a screening survey for this study, which included a baseline survey, randomization (stratified by gender and grade) to conditions (control; CBI; TBI) and 3-, 6- and 12-month assessments. MEASUREMENTS: Using an intent-to-treat approach, primary outcomes were cannabis use (any, frequency); secondary outcomes included frequency of other drug use, severity of alcohol use and frequency of delinquency (among 85% completing follow-ups).

findingsCompared with controls, CBI participants had significantly lower rates of any cannabis use over 12 months (24.16%, 16.82%, respectively, P < 0.05), frequency of cannabis use at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05) and other drug use at 3 months (P < 0.01). Compared with controls, TBI participants did not differ in cannabis use or frequency, but had significantly less other drug use at 3 months (P < 0.05), alcohol use at 6 months (P < 0.01) and delinquency at 3 months (P < 0.01).

conclusionsAmong adolescents in urban primary care in the United States, a computer brief intervention appeared to prevent and reduce cannabis use. Both computer and therapist delivered brief interventions appeared to have small effects in reducing other risk behaviors, but these dissipated over time.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingChildFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyMaleMarijuana SmokingMotivational InterviewingTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUrban PopulationAdolescentalcoholbrief interventioncannabiscomputerizeddelinquencydrugpreventionprimary careurban

Identifiers

PMID24372937
PMCPMC3984620
OpenAlexW2129771707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.