Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24372758›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Patient-physician communication about early stage prostate cancer: analysis of overall visit structure.

Stephen G Henry, Danielle Czarnecki, Valerie C Kahn, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, Angela Fagerlin, Peter A Ubel, David R Rovner, Stewart C Alexander, Sara J Knight, Margaret Holmes-Rovner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exploring Communication Dynamics Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Preparing Patients with Early Stage Prostate Cancer to Participate in Clinical Appointments Using a Shared Decision Making Training Video.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Challenge of Coming Out to Providers by Gay and Bisexual Men With Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Results from theInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Decision aid use during post-biopsy consultations for localized prostate cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephen G HenryDivision of General Medicine, Geriatrics, and Bioethics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Danielle CzarneckiDepartment of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Valerie C KahnCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Wen-Ying Sylvia ChouBehavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Angela FagerlinCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Peter A UbelFuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
David R RovnerCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Stewart C AlexanderDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Sara J KnightVA Health Services Research & Development, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Margaret Holmes-RovnerCenter for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2RR024144 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$3.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe know little about patient-physician communication during visits to discuss diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.

objectiveTo examine the overall visit structure and how patients and physicians transition between communication activities during visits in which patients received new prostate cancer diagnoses.

participantsForty veterans and 18 urologists at one VA medical centre.

methodsWe coded 40 transcripts to identify major communication activities during visits and used empiric discourse analysis to analyse transitions between activities.

resultsWe identified five communication activities that occurred in the following typical sequence: 'diagnosis delivery', 'risk classification', 'options talk', 'decision talk' and 'next steps'. The first two activities were typically brief and involved minimal patient participation. Options talk was typically the longest activity; physicians explicitly announced the beginning of options talk and framed it as their professional responsibility. Some patients were unsure of the purpose of visit and/or who should make treatment decisions.

conclusionVisits to deliver the diagnosis of early stage prostate cancer follow a regular sequence of communication activities. Physicians focus on discussing treatment options and devote comparatively little time and attention to discussing the new cancer diagnosis. Towards the goal of promoting patient-centred communication, physicians should consider eliciting patient reactions after diagnosis delivery and explaining the decision-making process before describing treatment options.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransProstate-Specific Antigendiscourse analysispatient-centred communicationprostate cancerqualitative researchstructuretransitionsveterans

Identifiers

PMID24372758
PMCPMC4370798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.