ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2014
Differential interactions of antiretroviral agents with LXR, ER and GR nuclear receptors: potential contributing factors to adverse events.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efavirenz-induced grade III gynecomastia in an HIV-positive male patient: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Jekyll and Hyde: nuclear receptors ignite and extinguish hepatic oxidative milieu.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2021Review
- Reciprocal Modulation of Antiretroviral Drug and Steroid Receptor FunctionAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Article
- Microphysiological flux balance platform unravels the dynamics of drug induced steatosis.Lab on a chip · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAntiretroviral (ARV) drugs activate pregnane X receptors and constitutive androstane receptors, increasing the risk of drug interactions due to altered drug metabolism and disposition. The closely related liver X receptors (LXRα/β), oestrogen receptors (ERα/β) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulate many endogenous processes such as lipid/cholesterol homeostasis, cellular differentiation and inflammation. However, ARV drug activation of these nuclear receptors has not been thoroughly investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The ability of an ARV drug library to activate LXRα/β, ERα/β and GR was assessed using a combined in silico and in vitro approach encompassing computational docking and molecular descriptor filtering, cell-free time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer co-activator assays to assess direct binding to ligand-binding domains (LBDs), cell-based reporter assays and target gene expression. KEY
resultsDirect LBD interactions with LXRα and/or LXRβ were predicted in silico and confirmed in vitro for darunavir, efavirenz, flavopiridol, maraviroc and tipranavir. Likewise, efavirenz was also predicted and confirmed as a ligand of ERα-LBD. Interestingly, atazanavir and ritonavir also activated LXRα/β in reporter assays, while tipranavir enhanced transcriptional activity of ERα. Effects on ER and LXR target gene expression were confirmed for efavirenz and tipranavir. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: There was good agreement between in silico predictions and in vitro results. However, some nuclear receptor interactions identified in vitro were probably due to allosteric effects or nuclear receptor cross-talk, rather than direct LBD binding. This study indicates that some of the adverse effects associated with ARV use may be mediated through 'off-target' effects involving nuclear receptor activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.