Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24372456›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP2014

Are ACOs ready to be accountable for medication use?

Robert W Dubois, Marv Feldman, Adam Lustig, Greg Kotzbauer, Jerry Penso, Scott D Pope, Kimberly D Westrich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of ACO readiness to optimize medication use: are we there yet?Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Optimization of Medication Use at Accountable Care Organizations.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of pharmacy services in accountable care organizations.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert W DuboisNational Pharmaceutical Council, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Ste. 800, Washington, DC 20006, USA. rdubois@npcnow.org.
Marv Feldman
Adam Lustig
Greg Kotzbauer
Jerry Penso
Scott D Pope
Kimberly D Westrich
Carolinas Healthcare System · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USNational Health Council · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccountable care organizations (ACOs) have the potential to lower costs and improve quality through incentives and coordinated care. However, the design brings with it many new challenges. One such challenge is the optimal use of pharmaceuticals. Most ACOs have not yet focused on this integral facet of care, even though medications are a critical component to achieving the lower costs and improved quality that are anticipated with this new model.

objectiveTo evaluate whether ACOs are prepared to maximize the value of medications for achieving quality benchmarks and cost offsets.

methodsDuring the fall of 2012, an electronic readiness self-assessment was developed using a portion of the questions and question methodology from the National Survey of Accountable Care Organizations, along with original questions developed by the authors. The assessment was tested and subsequently revised based on feedback from pilot testing with 5 ACO representatives. The revised assessment was distributed via e-mail to a convenience sample (n=175) of ACO members of the American Medical Group Association, Brookings-Dartmouth ACO Learning Network, and Premier Healthcare Alliance.

resultsThe self-assessment was completed by 46 ACO representatives (26% response rate). ACOs reported high readiness to manage medications in a few areas, such as transmitting prescriptions electronically (70%), being able to integrate medical and pharmacy data into a single database (54%), and having a formulary in place that encourages generic use when appropriate (50%). However, many areas have substantial room for improvement with few ACOs reporting high readiness. Some notable areas include being able to quantify the cost offsets and hence demonstrate the value of appropriate medication use (7%), notifying a physician when a prescription has been filled (9%), having protocols in place to avoid medication duplication and polypharmacy (17%), and having quality metrics in place for a broad diversity of conditions (22%).

conclusionsDeveloping the capabilities to support, monitor, and ensure appropriate medication use will be critical to achieve optimal patient outcomes and ACO success. The ACOs surveyed have embarked upon an important journey towards this goal, but critical gaps remain before they can become fully accountable. While many of these organizations have begun adopting health information technologies that allow them to maximize the value of medications for achieving quality outcomes and cost offsets, a significant lag was identified in their inability to use these technologies to their full capacities. In order to provide further guidance, the authors have begun documenting case studies for public release that would provide ACOs with examples of how certain medication issues have been addressed by ACOs or relevant organizations. The authors hope that these case studies will help ACOs optimize the value of pharmaceuticals and achieve the "triple aim" of improving care, health, and cost.

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsCosts and Cost AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareDisease ManagementHumansMedicarePatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacyUnited StatesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID24372456
PMCPMC10437746
OpenAlexW2185359903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.