The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: From Values to Architecture.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015
   Trial
2. Pediatric data sharing in genomic research: attitudes and preferences of parents.Pediatrics · 2014
   Trial
3. Maturing pharmacogenomic factors deliver improvements and cost efficiencies.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
   Review
4. A FAUSTIAN BARGAIN THAT UNDERMINES RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS' PRIVACY RIGHTS AND RETURN OF RESULTS.Florida law review · 2019
   Article
5. THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT AT AGE 10: GINA'S CONTROVERSIAL ASSERTION THAT DATA TRANSPARENCY PROTECTS PRIVACY AND CIVIL RIGHTS.William and Mary law review · 2019
   Article
6. Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017
   Article
7. A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
   Article
8. The First Amendment Right to Speak About the Human Genome.University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law · 2014
   Article
9. A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2014
   Article
10. Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013
    Article
11. Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2013
    Review
12. Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.The Hastings Center report
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.