Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24371389›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2013

Clinical and histological correlation in post-burn hypertrophic scar for pain and itching sensation.

Young-Hee Choi, Kwang-Min Kim, Hye-One Kim, Young-Chul Jang, In-Suk Kwak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for postburn pruritus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Research advances on the mechanism and treatment of post-burn pruritus].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Review
  10. Healing Mechanisms in Cutaneous Wounds: Tipping the Balance.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Novel Analgesics with Peripheral Targets.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  15. Post-Burn Pruritus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Dorsal pentagonal island flap to reconstruct post-burn interdigital web.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Young-Hee ChoiDepartment of Pathology, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang-Min KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hye-One KimDepartment of Dermatology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Chul JangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
In-Suk KwakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic scar following a burn is caused by the excessive deposit of collagen resulting in an exaggerated wound healing response. The burn patient complains of pain and itching over the scar, which can give rise to cosmetic and functional problems.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and histological correlation of a hypertrophic burn scar for itching and pain sensations.

methodsThirty-eight patients underwent a scar release and skin graft. the modified Vancouver scar scale and the verbal numerical rating scale were recorded. All biopsies were taken from scar tissue (scar) and normal tissue (normal). Histologically, tissues were observed in the epidermis, the monocytes around the vessels, the collagen fiber, elastic fiber, and the mast cells.

resultsThe mean total score of MVSS was 8.4±2.7 (pliability 2.0±0.9; thickness 1.8±0.9; vascularity 2.0± 0.9; and pigmentation 2.1±0.9). Pain and itching were 2.4±2.0 and 2.9±3.0. Epidermis were 7.9±2.8 layers (scar) and 4.0±0.8 layers (normal). The collagen fibers were thin and dense (scar) and thicker and loose (normal). The elastic fibers were thin and nonexistent (scar) and thin and loose (normal). Mast cells were 11.2±5.8/high power field (scar) and 7.4±4.1 (normal).

conclusionAs the scar tissue thickens, the itching becomes more severe. The stiffness of the scar with the pain appeared to be associated with the condition of the tissue. The correlation between clinical and histological post-burn hypertrophic scars will help further studies on the scar. This helped with the development of the base material for therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Hypertrophic scarItchingPain

Identifiers

PMID24371389
PMCPMC3870210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.