Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24371218›Full record

ReviewHealth policy and planning2015

The community case management of pneumonia in Africa: a review of the evidence.

Thomas Druetz, Kendra Siekmans, Sylvie Goossens, Valéry Ridde, Slim Haddad

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy and planning, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas DruetzResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France thomas.druetz@umontreal.ca.
Kendra SiekmansResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France.
Sylvie GoossensResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France.
Valéry RiddeResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France.
Slim HaddadResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), 850 Rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Avenue du Parc, Montreal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada Healthbridge, 1 Nicholas Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 7B7, Canada and Independent Consultant, Paris, France.
Université de Montréal · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia causes around 750 000 child deaths per year in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. The lack of accessibility to prompt and effective treatment is an important contributor to this burden. Community case management of pneumonia (CCMp) uses trained community health workers (CHWs) to administer antibiotics to suspected child pneumonia cases in villages. This strategy has been gaining momentum in low- and middle-income countries, and the World Health Organization and United Nations children's fund have recently encouraged countries to broaden community case management to other diseases. Recommendations in favour CCMp are based on three meta-analyses showing its efficacy to reduce childhood mortality and morbidity attributable to pneumonia although most of the studies in the meta-analyses were conducted in Asian countries. This is problematic as community case management strategies have been implemented in very different ways in Asian and SSA countries, partly due to differences in malaria prevalence. Therefore, we conducted a narrative synthesis to systematically review the evidence on CCMp in SSA. Results show that there is a lack of evidence concerning its efficacy and effectiveness in SSA, irrespective of whether case management is integrated with other diseases or not. CHWs encounter difficulties in counting the respiratory rate. Their adherence to the guidelines is poorer when they are required to manage several illnesses or children with severe signs. CCMp thus encompasses issues of over-treatment and missed treatment, with potentially negative consequences such as increased lethality in severe cases and antibiotics resistance. The current lack of evidence concerning its efficacy, effectiveness and the factors leading to successful implementation, coupled with CHWs' poor adherence, demand a thorough examination of the legitimacy of implementing CCMp in SSA countries.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase ManagementChildCommunity Health WorkersHumansPneumonia, BacterialProgram EvaluationAnti-Bacterial Agentsacute respiratory infectionsCase managementcommunity healthsystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID24371218
PMCPMC4325533
OpenAlexW2126295587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.