Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24371012›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular translational research2014

Randomized comparison of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and planned invasive strategy--design and rationale of the iNtracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 trial.

Stefanie Schulz, Dominick J Angiolillo, David Antoniucci, Isabell Bernlochner, Christian Hamm, Juliane Jaitner, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Katharina Mayer, Barbara von Merzljak, Tanja Morath and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Incidence and pattern of urgent revascularization in acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Oral Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Optimization of Antiplatelet Therapy in STEMI.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefanie SchulzDeutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, schulzs@dhm.mhn.de.
Dominick J Angiolillo
David Antoniucci
Isabell Bernlochner
Christian Hamm
Juliane Jaitner
Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz
Katharina Mayer
Barbara von Merzljak
Tanja Morath
Franz-Josef Neumann
Gert Richardt
Judith Ruf
Gisela Schömig
Helmut Schühlen
Heribert Schunkert
Adnan Kastrati
Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 Trial Investigators
Deutsches Herzzentrum München · DETUM Klinikum · DEAuguste-Viktoria-Klinik · DEUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), a dual antiplatelet regimen with an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist plus aspirin has become the cornerstone of treatment. The third-generation thienopyridine prasugrel and the cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine ticagrelor provide a greater, more rapid and consistent platelet inhibition compared to their predecessor clopidogrel. Based on their advantages over clopidogrel in two landmark studies, both drugs received a class I recommendation for their use in ACS patients with and without ST segment elevation. Due to differences in ACS populations and conditions investigated, the relative merits of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in the treatment of ACS patients with planned invasive strategy cannot be reliably estimated from independent trials. To date, no direct head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel in terms of clinical outcome exists. The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial is to assess whether ticagrelor is superior to prasugrel in ACS patients with planned invasive strategy.

Indexed as

Research DesignStentsAcute Coronary SyndromeAdenosineClinical ProtocolsCoronary ThrombosisDrug Administration ScheduleFibrinolytic AgentsGermanyHumansMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPiperazinesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideStrokeAdenosineFibrinolytic AgentsPiperazinesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideThiophenesTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID24371012
OpenAlexW1971907780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.