Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24370928›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2014

Tolerance--is it worth it?

Erik B Finger, Terry B Strom, Arthur J Matas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial products in donor airways prevent the induction of lung transplant tolerance.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik B FingerDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
Terry B Strom
Arthur J Matas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are entering an exciting time in the study of immunologic tolerance. Several cellular and molecular strategies have been developed that show promise in nonhuman transplant models and these approaches are just now appearing in clinical trials. Tolerance strategies that prevent immune rejection and obviate the need for immunosuppressive medications (with inherent risk of cancer, infection, and organ toxicity) would improve both graft and patient survival. Each tolerance protocol brings its own set of associated risks. As the results of these trials become available, we must continue to evaluate their successes and failures. The balance of these outcomes will help us answer the question: "Tolerance-Is it worth it?"

Indexed as

Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell ReceptorsCosts and Cost AnalysisGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsStem Cell TransplantationT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryTransplantation ChimeraTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation ToleranceCostimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell ReceptorsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID24370928
PMCPMC3904098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.