ReviewProtein and peptide letters2014
Watching single proteins using engineered nanopores.
Review in Protein and peptide letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flux through membrane channel: linear transportPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025Article
- Capturing single molecules by nanopores: measured times and thermodynamics.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2021Article
- A pH-independent quiet OmpG pore with enhanced electrostatic repulsion among the extracellular loops.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2021Article
- Engineering a Novel Porin OmpGF Via Strand Replacement from Computational Analysis of Sequence Motif.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2017Article
- Fingerprinting of Peptides with a Large Channel of Bacteriophage Phi29 DNA Packaging Motor.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2016Article
- Label-free nanopore single-molecule measurement of trypsin activity.ACS sensors · 2016Article
- Communication: Charge, diffusion, and mobility of proteins through nanopores.The Journal of chemical physics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies in the area of single-molecule detection of proteins with nanopores show a great promise in fundamental science, bionanotechnology and proteomics. In this mini-review, I discuss a comprehensive array of examinations of protein detection and characterization using protein and solid-state nanopores. These investigations demonstrate the power of the single-molecule nanopore measurements to reveal a broad range of functional, structural, biochemical and biophysical features of proteins, such as their backbone flexibility, enzymatic activity, binding affinity as well as their concentration, size and folding state. Engineered nanopores in organic materials and in inorganic membranes coupled with surface modification and protein engineering might provide a new generation of sensing devices for molecular biomedical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.