Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24369986›Full record

ReviewTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2014

A review of preclinical animal models utilised for TB vaccine evaluation in the context of recent human efficacy data.

Helen McShane, Ann Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MVA85A vaccine to enhance BCG for preventing tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. BCGΔBCG1419c increased memory CD8Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Beijing genotype ofNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Vaccination Strategies Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: BCG and Beyond.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Helen McShaneThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. Electronic address: Helen.mcshane@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Ann WilliamsPublic Health England, Porton Down, Porton, Salisbury, UK. Electronic address: ann.rawkins@phe.gov.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for an improved TB vaccine. Vaccine development is hindered by the lack of immune correlates and uncertain predictive value of preclinical animal models. As data become available from human efficacy trials, there is an opportunity to evaluate the predictive value of the criteria used to select candidate vaccines. Here we review the efficacy in animal models of the MVA85A candidate vaccine in light of recent human efficacy data and propose refinements to the preclinical models with the aim of increasing their predictive value for human efficacy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBCG VaccineCattleDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGuinea PigsHumansMiceModels, AnimalMycobacterium tuberculosisPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimatesTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNABCG VaccineMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAClinicalEfficacyMVA85APre-clinicalVaccine

Identifiers

PMID24369986
PMCPMC3969587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.