ArticleAcademic pediatrics
Provider attitudes toward public-private collaboration to improve immunization reminder/recall: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of State Immunization Information System Centralized Reminder and Recall on HPV Vaccination Rates.Pediatrics · 2020Trial
- Coaching primary care clinics for HPV vaccination quality improvement: Comparing in-person and webinar implementation.Translational behavioral medicine · 2019Trial
- Childhood Vaccination Practices and Parental Hesitancy Barriers in Rural and Urban Primary Care Settings.Journal of community health · 2023Article
- Geographic proximity to immunization providers and vaccine series completion among children ages 0-24 months.Vaccine · 2023Article
- Barriers to and facilitators of early childhood immunization in rural areas of the United States: A systematic review of the literature.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Review
- The potential for centralized reminder/recall to increase immunization rates: A national survey of immunization information systems (IIS) managers.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Supporting and sustaining centralized reminder/recall for immunizations: Qualitative insights from stakeholders.Vaccine · 2019Article
- Organizational factors influencing successful primary care and public health collaboration.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Potential Strategies to Achieve Universal Influenza Vaccination for Children: Provider Attitudes in Two States.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess primary care providers' current reminder/recall practices, preferences for collaboration with health departments in reminder/recall efforts, attitudes toward practice-based and population-based reminder/recall, and experiences with a population-based reminder/recall intervention.
methodsProviders responsible for making decisions about immunization delivery at all primary care practices that participate in the Colorado Immunization Information System were surveyed. Data collection was preceded by an intervention in which half of 14 counties received a population-based reminder/recall intervention conducted by the health department. Practice staff involved in immunization activities were then selected for semistructured telephone interviews that were based on the location of their practice within specified strata, including whether they were in the intervention counties, urban/rural location, and practice type.
resultsA total of 282 (73.6%) of 383 of providers responded to the survey, and 253 who administered vaccines to children 19 to 35 months were retained; 82 staff members at 36 practices were interviewed. Providers' preferences for who should conduct reminder/recall were almost evenly split, with slightly more indicating that it should be conducted by the health department. Cost and feasibility issues were perceived barriers to conducting practice-based recall, particularly among urban practices. Support for population-based reminder/recall was highest among rural practices. Concern about perceived inaccuracies in immunization registry data was the major barrier to conducting population-based reminder/recall. The population-based intervention did not create an undue burden on practices.
conclusionsA collaborative approach to reminder/recall involving both providers and health departments is preferable for many providers and may be a viable solution to the barriers of practice-based reminder/recall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.