Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24369778›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2013

Walking the fine line: self-reported reasons for substance use in persons with severe mental illness.

Henning Pettersen, Torleif Ruud, Edle Ravndal, Anne Landheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henning PettersenNational Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway; SERAF - Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; henning.pettersen@medisin.uio.no.
Torleif RuudDivision Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Edle RavndalSERAF - Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne LandheimNational Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many theoretical models have been proposed to explain the relationship between severe mental illness (SMI) and substance use. Because many of these are contradictory quantitative American studies, a qualitative, exploratory study of a Scandinavian sample may offer a new perspective. The aim of the study is to explore reasons for substance use through analysis of the participants' experiences. A qualitative study with semistructured interviews was used. Purposeful sampling (N=11) of patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and SMI, who were included in assertive community treatment teams, was completed. Inclusion criteria are increased quality of life or increased general functioning, and decreased substance use, after a minimum of 12 months in treatment. Reasons given for using substances were categorized as (a) controlling the symptoms of mental illness, (b) counteracting medication side effects, or (c) balancing the ambiguity. The conclusion is that the study findings mainly support secondary substance use models in explaining the comorbidity of SMI and substance use. However, there is some support for the traditional self-medication hypothesis (SMH), iatrogenic vulnerability, and the supersensitivity model. This may be because the majority of the study participants reported having a mental illness with subsequent substance use. The expressed ambivalence to substance use also lends some support to bidirectional models.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderCommunity Mental Health ServicesComorbidityDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalNorwayPersons with Psychiatric DisordersPsychotic DisordersQualitative ResearchAntipsychotic Agentsassertive community treatmentmodels of comorbiditypatient experiencesPsychotic disorderqualitative studyself-medication

Identifiers

PMID24369778
PMCPMC3871834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.