Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24369425›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Improved seamless mutagenesis by recombineering using ccdB for counterselection.

Hailong Wang, Xiaoying Bian, Liqiu Xia, Xuezhi Ding, Rolf Müller, Youming Zhang, Jun Fu, A Francis Stewart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Engineering the probioticSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developing the protein quality control system inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hailong WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Microbial Molecular Biology-State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Microbial Molecular Biology, College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, 410081 Changsha, People's Republic of China, Department of Genomics, Dresden University of Technology, BioInnovations-Zentrum, Tatzberg 47-51, 01307 Dresden, Germany, Shandong University-Helmholtz Joint Institute of Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Shanda Nanlu 27, 250100 Jinan, People's Republic of China, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research and Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Saarland University, PO Box 151150, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany and Gene Bridges GmbH, Building C2.3, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Xiaoying Bian
Liqiu Xia
Xuezhi Ding
Rolf Müller
Youming Zhang
Jun Fu
A Francis Stewart
Shandong University · CNHunan Normal University · CNTechnische Universität Dresden · DEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombineering, which is the use of homologous recombination for DNA engineering in Escherichia coli, usually uses antibiotic selection to identify the intended recombinant. When combined in a second step with counterselection using a small molecule toxin, seamless products can be obtained. Here, we report the advantages of a genetic strategy using CcdB as the counterselectable agent. Expression of CcdB is toxic to E. coli in the absence of the CcdA antidote so counterselection is initiated by the removal of CcdA expression. CcdB counterselection is robust and does not require titrations or experiment-to-experiment optimization. Because counterselection strategies necessarily differ according to the copy number of the target, we describe two variations. For multi-copy targets, we use two E. coli hosts so that counterselection is exerted by the transformation step that is needed to separate the recombined and unrecombined plasmids. For single copy targets, we put the ccdA gene onto the temperature-sensitive pSC101 Red expression plasmid so that counterselection is exerted by the standard temperature shift to remove the expression plasmid. To reduce unwanted intramolecular recombination, we also combined CcdB counterselection with Redα omission. These options improve the use of counterselection in recombineering with BACs, plasmids and the E. coli chromosome.

Indexed as

Homologous RecombinationMutagenesisBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialDNA GyraseEscherichia coliGenetic EngineeringPlasmidsPoint MutationRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCcdA protein, BacteriaCcdB protein, Plasmid FDNA Gyrase

Identifiers

PMID24369425
PMCPMC3950717
OpenAlexW2128356141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.