Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24369387›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2014

Race/ethnicity and geographic access to Medicaid substance use disorder treatment facilities in the United States.

Janet R Cummings, Hefei Wen, Michelle Ko, Benjamin G Druss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rural health and rural industries: Opportunities for partnership and action.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janet R CummingsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Hefei WenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michelle KoDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Benjamin G DrussDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Mentoring and Research: Public Health Interventions to Improve Health in SMIK24MH075867 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRUSS, BENJAMIN G · 2006 to 2015
$1.3M
Understanding Child Mental Health Services in the Public Safety NetK01MH095823 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CUMMINGS, JANET R. · 2012 to 2016
$830k
NIMH NIH HHS 1K01MH09582301NIMH NIH HHS 5K24MH07586705NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH095823NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH075867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAlthough substance use disorders (SUDs) are prevalent and associated with adverse consequences, treatment rates remain low. Unlike physical and mental health problems, treatment for SUDs is predominantly provided in a separate specialty sector and more heavily financed by public sources. Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has the potential to increase access to treatment for SUDs but only if an infrastructure exists to serve new enrollees.

objectiveTo examine the availability of outpatient SUD treatment facilities that accept Medicaid across US counties and whether counties with a higher percentage of racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to have gaps in this infrastructure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe used data from the 2009 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services public use file and the 2011-2012 Area Resource file to examine sociodemographic factors associated with county-level access to SUD treatment facilities that serve Medicaid enrollees. Counties in all 50 states were included. We estimated a probit model with state indicators to adjust for state-level heterogeneity in demographics, politics, and policies. Independent variables assessed county racial/ethnic composition (ie, percentage black and percentage Hispanic), percentage living in poverty, percentage living in a rural area, percentage insured with Medicaid, percentage uninsured, and total population. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Dichotomous indicator for counties with at least 1 outpatient SUD treatment facility that accepts Medicaid.

resultsApproximately 60% of US counties have at least 1 outpatient SUD facility that accepts Medicaid, although this rate is lower in many Southern and Midwestern states than in other areas of the country. Counties with a higher percentage of black (marginal effect [ME],  -3.1; 95% CI,  -5.2% to -0.9%), rural (-9.2%; -11.1% to -7.4%), and/or uninsured (-9.5%; -13.0% to -5.9%) residents are less likely to have one of these facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The potential for increasing access to SUD treatment via Medicaid expansion may be tempered by the local availability of facilities to provide care, particularly for counties with a high percentage of black and/or uninsured residents and for rural counties. Although states that opt in to the expansion will secure additional federal funds for the SUD treatment system, additional policies may need to be implemented to ensure that adequate geographic access exists across local communities to serve new enrollees.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealth Services AccessibilityRacial GroupsSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersHumansMedicaidSocioeconomic FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24369387
PMCPMC4039494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.