Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24368740›Full record

SynthesisClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2014

Intermittent levosimendan improves mid-term survival in chronic heart failure patients: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Simona Silvetti, Teresa Greco, Ambra Licia Di Prima, Marta Mucchetti, Castro Maria de Lurdes, Laura Pasin, Mara Scandroglio, Giovanni Landoni, Alberto Zangrillo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Investigating the role of acute mental stress on endothelial dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Repetitive infusion of levosimendan in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. A single German center experience with intermittent inotropes for patients on the high-urgent heart transplant waiting list.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 Years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The inodilator levosimendan in repetitive doses in the treatment of advanced heart failure.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  15. The potential of the inodilator levosimendan in maintaining quality of life in advanced heart failure.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Long-term intravenous inotropes in low-output terminal heart failure?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Authors' reply concerning the letter by Ensminger et al.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona SilvettiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Teresa Greco
Ambra Licia Di Prima
Marta Mucchetti
Castro Maria de Lurdes
Laura Pasin
Mara Scandroglio
Giovanni Landoni
Alberto Zangrillo
San Raffaele University of Rome · ITCentro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStandard inotropic treatment is often necessary in end-stage heart failure but may be harmful. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect of repeated administration of levosimendan on survival in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND

resultsFour investigators independently searched in CENTRAL, Google Scholar MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials to identify any randomized study ever performed with intermittent levosimendan intravenous administration in adult patients with chronic heart failure with no restrictions on dose or time of administration. Data from a total of 326 patients from six randomized controlled studies using intermittent levosimendan in a cardiological setting were included in the analysis. Levosimendan was associated with a significant reduction in mortality at the longest follow-up available [32 of 168 (19 %) in the levosimendan group 46 of 133 (35 %) in the control arm, RR = 0.55 (95 % CI 0.37-0.84), p for effect = 0 0.005, p for heterogeneity = 0.3, I (2) = 23.4 %, NNT = 6 with 5 studies included]. Brain natriuretic peptide values, ejection fraction and number of patients with New York Heart Association ≥ III status were similar in survivors of both groups.

conclusionsA large randomized trial is necessary to confirm the promising beneficial effects of intermittent levosimendan administration on the mid-term survival of patients with chronic heart failure.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultCardiotonic AgentsChronic DiseaseHeart FailureHumansHydrazonesPyridazinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSimendanSurvival RateTime FactorsCardiotonic AgentsHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendan

Identifiers

PMID24368740
OpenAlexW2025754714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.