ArticleEpilepsy research2014
Early susceptibility for epileptiform activity in malformed cortex.
Article in Epilepsy research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synaptic Dysregulation Drives Hyperexcitability in Pyramidal Neurons Surrounding Freeze-Induced Neocortical Malformations in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Altered excitatory and inhibitory neocortical circuitry leads to increased convulsive severity after pentylenetetrazol injection in an animal model of schizencephaly, but not of microgyria.Epilepsia open · 2022Article
- Laser-scanning astrocyte mapping reveals increased glutamate-responsive domain size and disrupted maturation of glutamate uptake following neonatal cortical freeze-lesion.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite early disruption of developmental processes, hyperexcitability is often delayed after the induction of cortical malformations. In the freeze-lesion model of microgyria, interictal activity cannot be evoked in vitro until postnatal day (P)12, despite the increased excitatory afferent input to the epileptogenic region by P10. In order to determine the most critical time period for assessment of epileptogenic mechanisms, here we have used low-Mg(2+) aCSF as a second hit after the neonatal freeze lesion to examine whether there is an increased susceptibility prior to the overt expression of epileptiform activity. This two-hit model produced increased interictal activity in freeze-lesioned relative to control cortex. We quantified this with measures of incidence by sweep, time to first epileptiform event, and magnitude of late activity. The increase was present even in the P7-9 survival group, before increased excitatory afferents invade, as well as in the P10-11 and P12-15 groups. In our young adult group (P28-36), the amount of interictal activity did not differ, but only the lesioned cortices produced ictal activity. We conclude that epileptogenic processes begin early and continue beyond the expression of interictal activity, with different time courses for susceptibility for interictal and ictal activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.