Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24368070›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2014

Totipotency: what it is and what it is not.

Maureen L Condic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The making of cells and organs in xenogeneic animal bioreactor.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Totipotency or plenipotency: rethinking stem cell bipotentiality.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mouse and human embryonic genome activation initiate at the one-cell stage.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. The Mammalian Oocyte: A Central Hub for Cellular Reprogramming and Stemness.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Induce Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSC) Technology in Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. In Vitro Embryogenesis and Gastrulation Using Stem Cells in Mice and Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maureen L CondicDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is surprising confusion surrounding the concept of biological totipotency, both within the scientific community and in society at large. Increasingly, ethical objections to scientific research have both practical and political implications. Ethical controversy surrounding an area of research can have a chilling effect on investors and industry, which in turn slows the development of novel medical therapies. In this context, clarifying precisely what is meant by "totipotency" and how it is experimentally determined will both avoid unnecessary controversy and potentially reduce inappropriate barriers to research. Here, the concept of totipotency is discussed, and the confusions surrounding this term in the scientific and nonscientific literature are considered. A new term, "plenipotent," is proposed to resolve this confusion. The requirement for specific, oocyte-derived cytoplasm as a component of totipotency is outlined. Finally, the implications of twinning for our understanding of totipotency are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansStem CellsTerminology as TopicBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24368070
PMCPMC3991987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.