Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24367561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Slug is a predictor of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Md Raghibul Hasan, Rinu Sharma, Anoop Saraya, Tushar K Chattopadhyay, Siddartha DattaGupta, Paul G Walfish, Shyam S Chauhan, Ranju Ralhan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MicroRNA-1 (miR-1) inhibits chordoma cell migration and invasion by targeting slug.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Raghibul HasanDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rinu SharmaSchool of Biotechnology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, India.
Anoop SarayaDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tushar K ChattopadhyayDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Siddartha DattaGuptaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Paul G WalfishDepartment of Medicine, Endocrine Division, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Alex and Simona Shnaider Research Laboratory in Molecular Oncology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Joseph and Mildred Sonshine Family Centre for Head and Neck Diseases, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shyam S ChauhanDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ranju RalhanDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India ; Department of Medicine, Endocrine Division, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Alex and Simona Shnaider Research Laboratory in Molecular Oncology, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Joseph and Mildred Sonshine Family Centre for Head and Neck Diseases, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGuru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University · INUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSlug, a regulator of epithelial mesenchymal transition, was identified to be differentially expressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) using cDNA microarrays by our laboratory. This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of Slug overexpression in ESCC and determine its correlation with clinicopathological parameters and disease prognosis for ESCC patients.

methodsImmunohistochemical analysis of Slug expression was carried out in archived tissue sections from 91 ESCCs, 61 dysplastic and 47 histologically normal esophageal tissues. Slug immunopositivity in epithelial cells was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and disease prognosis over up to 7.5 years for ESCC patients.

resultsIncreased expression of Slug was observed in esophageal dysplasia [cytoplasmic, 24/61 (39.3%) cases, p = 0.001, odd's ratio (OR) = 4.7; nuclear, 11/61 (18%) cases, p < 0.001, OR = 1.36] in comparison with normal esophageal tissues. The Slug expression was further increased in ESCCs [cytoplasmic, 64/91 (70.3%) p < 0.001, OR = 10.0; nuclear, 27/91 (29.7%) p < 0.001, OR = 1.42]. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed significant association of nuclear Slug accumulation with reduced disease free survival of ESCC patients (median disease free survival (DFS) = 6 months, as compared to those that did not show overexpression, DFS = 18 months; p = 0.006). In multivariate Cox regression analysis nuclear Slug expression [p= 0.005, Hazard's ratio (HR) = 2.269, 95% CI = 1.289 - 3.996] emerged as the most significant independent predictor of poor prognosis for ESCC patients.

conclusionsAlterations in Slug expression occur in early stages of development of ESCC and are sustained during disease progression. Slug may serve as a diagnostic biomarker and as a predictor of poor disease prognosis to identify ESCC patients that are likely to show recurrence of the disease.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Vitro TechniquesKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePrognosisSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorSNAI1 protein, humanSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24367561
PMCPMC3867395
OpenAlexW2074721780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.