Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24367394›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2013

Modified logistic regression models using gene coexpression and clinical features to predict prostate cancer progression.

Hongya Zhao, Christopher J Logothetis, Ivan P Gorlov, Jia Zeng, Jianguo Dai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongya ZhaoIndustrial Center, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China ; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Unit 1374, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
Christopher J LogothetisDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Unit 1374, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
Ivan P GorlovDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Unit 1374, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
Jia ZengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Jianguo DaiSchool of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China.
Shenzhen Polytechnic · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSoochow University · CN

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
The Odd-Even Effect of Polymorphic CA repeats in the 5' Regulatory Region of theR03CA128025 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GORLOV, IVAN P · 2007 to 2008
$154k
NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R03 CA128025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting disease progression is one of the most challenging problems in prostate cancer research. Adding gene expression data to prediction models that are based on clinical features has been proposed to improve accuracy. In the current study, we applied a logistic regression (LR) model combining clinical features and gene co-expression data to improve the accuracy of the prediction of prostate cancer progression. The top-scoring pair (TSP) method was used to select genes for the model. The proposed models not only preserved the basic properties of the TSP algorithm but also incorporated the clinical features into the prognostic models. Based on the statistical inference with the iterative cross validation, we demonstrated that prediction LR models that included genes selected by the TSP method provided better predictions of prostate cancer progression than those using clinical variables only and/or those that included genes selected by the one-gene-at-a-time approach. Thus, we conclude that TSP selection is a useful tool for feature (and/or gene) selection to use in prognostic models and our model also provides an alternative for predicting prostate cancer progression.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticLogistic ModelsAlgorithmsArea Under CurveDisease ProgressionDNA, ComplementaryGenotypeHumansMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeProbabilityPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID24367394
PMCPMC3866878
OpenAlexW2123971850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.