Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24367322›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2013

Gamma band activity associated with BCI performance: simultaneous MEG/EEG study.

Minkyu Ahn, Sangtae Ahn, Jun H Hong, Hohyun Cho, Kiwoong Kim, Bong S Kim, Jin W Chang, Sung C Jun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive performance in Parkinson's disease mild cognitive impairment? An event-related potentials and neuropsychological assessment study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Brain-Computer Interface: Advancement and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Minkyu AhnSchool of Information and Communications, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology Gwangju, South Korea.
Sangtae AhnSchool of Information and Communications, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology Gwangju, South Korea.
Jun H HongSchool of Information and Communications, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology Gwangju, South Korea.
Hohyun ChoSchool of Information and Communications, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology Gwangju, South Korea.
Kiwoong KimKorea Research Institute of Standards and Science Daejeon, South Korea.
Bong S KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul, South Korea.
Jin W ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul, South Korea.
Sung C JunSchool of Information and Communications, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology Gwangju, South Korea ; Wadsworth Center, New York State Health Department, Albany NY, USA.
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology · KRYonsei University · KRKorea Research Institute of Standards and Science · KRWadsworth Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While brain computer interface (BCI) can be employed with patients and healthy subjects, there are problems that must be resolved before BCI can be useful to the public. In the most popular motor imagery (MI) BCI system, a significant number of target users (called "BCI-Illiterates") cannot modulate their neuronal signals sufficiently to use the BCI system. This causes performance variability among subjects and even among sessions within a subject. The mechanism of such BCI-Illiteracy and possible solutions still remain to be determined. Gamma oscillation is known to be involved in various fundamental brain functions, and may play a role in MI. In this study, we investigated the association of gamma activity with MI performance among subjects. Ten simultaneous MEG/EEG experiments were conducted; MI performance for each was estimated by EEG data, and the gamma activity associated with BCI performance was investigated with MEG data. Our results showed that gamma activity had a high positive correlation with MI performance in the prefrontal area. This trend was also found across sessions within one subject. In conclusion, gamma rhythms generated in the prefrontal area appear to play a critical role in BCI performance.

Indexed as

BCI-illiteracyEEGgamma activityMEGmotor imagery BCIperformance prediction

Identifiers

PMID24367322
PMCPMC3853408
OpenAlexW2166150354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.