Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24367247›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Electrodiffusive model for astrocytic and neuronal ion concentration dynamics.

Geir Halnes, Ivar Ostby, Klas H Pettersen, Stig W Omholt, Gaute T Einevoll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow.Annual review of fluid mechanics · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Changes in Astroglial KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Neuromodulation of Astrocytic KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geir HalnesDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Ivar OstbyDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Klas H PettersenCentre for Integrative Genetics, Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Stig W OmholtCentre for Integrative Genetics, Department of Animal and Aqucultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Gaute T EinevollDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cable equation is a proper framework for modeling electrical neural signalling that takes place at a timescale at which the ionic concentrations vary little. However, in neural tissue there are also key dynamic processes that occur at longer timescales. For example, endured periods of intense neural signaling may cause the local extracellular K(+)-concentration to increase by several millimolars. The clearance of this excess K(+) depends partly on diffusion in the extracellular space, partly on local uptake by astrocytes, and partly on intracellular transport (spatial buffering) within astrocytes. These processes, that take place at the time scale of seconds, demand a mathematical description able to account for the spatiotemporal variations in ion concentrations as well as the subsequent effects of these variations on the membrane potential. Here, we present a general electrodiffusive formalism for modeling of ion concentration dynamics in a one-dimensional geometry, including both the intra- and extracellular domains. Based on the Nernst-Planck equations, this formalism ensures that the membrane potential and ion concentrations are in consistency, it ensures global particle/charge conservation and it accounts for diffusion and concentration dependent variations in resistivity. We apply the formalism to a model of astrocytes exchanging ions with the extracellular space. The simulations show that K(+)-removal from high-concentration regions is driven by a local depolarization of the astrocyte membrane, which concertedly (i) increases the local astrocytic uptake of K(+), (ii) suppresses extracellular transport of K(+), (iii) increases axial transport of K(+) within astrocytes, and (iv) facilitates astrocytic relase of K(+) in regions where the extracellular concentration is low. Together, these mechanisms seem to provide a robust regulatory scheme for shielding the extracellular space from excess K(+).

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAstrocytesCations, MonovalentDiffusionMembrane PotentialsNeuronsPotassiumCations, MonovalentPotassium

Identifiers

PMID24367247
PMCPMC3868551
OpenAlexW1985454023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.