Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24366988›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2014

Two-year impact of the alternative quality contract on pediatric health care quality and spending.

Alyna T Chien, Zirui Song, Michael E Chernew, Bruce E Landon, Barbara J McNeil, Dana G Safran, Mark A Schuster

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alyna T ChienDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115-5737. alyna.chien@childrens.harvard.edu.
Zirui Song
Michael E Chernew
Bruce E Landon
Barbara J McNeil
Dana G Safran
Mark A Schuster

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MONICA E PEEK · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Do Performance Incentives Improve Healthcare Quality for Vulnerable Populations?K08HS017146 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHIEN, ALYNA TUNG-MEI · 2007 to 2011
$622k
Provider Payment Reform and Implications for Health Care CostsF30AG039175 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SONG, ZIRUI · 2010 to 2014
$161k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS017146NIA NIH HHS F30 AG039175NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the 2-year effect of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts' global budget arrangement, the Alternative Quality Contract (AQC), on pediatric quality and spending for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and non-CSHCN.

methodsUsing a difference-in-differences approach, we compared quality and spending trends for 126,975 unique 0- to 21-year-olds receiving care from AQC groups with 415,331 propensity-matched patients receiving care from non-AQC groups; 23% of enrollees were CSHCN. We compared quality and spending pre (2006-2008) and post (2009-2010) AQC implementation, adjusting analyses for age, gender, health risk score, and secular trends. Pediatric outcome measures included 4 preventive and 2 acute care measures tied to pay-for-performance (P4P), 3 asthma and 2 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder quality measures not tied to P4P, and average total annual medical spending.

resultsDuring the first 2 years of the AQC, pediatric care quality tied to P4P increased by +1.8% for CSHCN (P < .001) and +1.2% for non-CSHCN (P < .001) for AQC versus non-AQC groups; quality measures not tied to P4P showed no significant changes. Average total annual medical spending was ~5 times greater for CSHCN than non-CSHCN; there was no significant impact of the AQC on spending trends for children.

conclusionsDuring the first 2 years of the contract, the AQC had a small but significant positive effect on pediatric preventive care quality tied to P4P; this effect was greater for CSHCN than non-CSHCN. However, it did not significantly influence (positively or negatively) CSHCN measures not tied to P4P or affect per capita spending for either group.

Indexed as

BudgetsReimbursement, IncentiveAdolescentBlue Cross Blue Shield Insurance PlansChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseCritical IllnessFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsMaleacute care qualityADHDasthmacapitationchildren with special health care needschronic disease care qualitypay-for-performancepaymentpediatricspreventive care

Identifiers

PMID24366988
PMCPMC4079291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.