Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24366741›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility of yeast isolates causing fungemia collected in a population-based study in Spain in 2010 and 2011.

Jesús Guinea, Óscar Zaragoza, Pilar Escribano, Estrella Martín-Mazuelos, Javier Pemán, Ferrán Sánchez-Reus, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, CANDIPOP Project, GEIH-GEMICOMED (SEIMC), and REIPI

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trends in antifungal use characteristics in primary care in Spain, 2019 to 2024: a nationwide study.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Enhancing ICUFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Trends in antifungal resistance inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  11. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Meyerozyma guilliermondii species complex: review of current epidemiology, antifungal resistance, and mechanisms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Fluconazole-resistantFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jesús GuineaClinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Óscar Zaragoza
Pilar Escribano
Estrella Martín-Mazuelos
Javier Pemán
Ferrán Sánchez-Reus
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella
CANDIPOP Project, GEIH-GEMICOMED (SEIMC), and REIPI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the molecular identifications and antifungal susceptibilities of the isolates causing fungemia collected in the CANDIPOP population-based study conducted in 29 Spanish hospitals. A total of 781 isolates (from 767 patients, 14 of them having mixed fungemia) were collected. The species found most frequently were Candida albicans (44.6%), Candida parapsilosis (24.5%), Candida glabrata (13.2%), Candida tropicalis (7.6%), Candida krusei (1.9%), Candida guilliermondii (1.7%), and Candida lusitaniae (1.3%). Other Candida and non-Candida species accounted for approximately 5% of the isolates. The presence of cryptic species was low. Compared to findings of previous studies conducted in Spain, the frequency of C. glabrata has increased. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by using EUCAST and CLSI M27-A3 reference procedures; the two methods were comparable. The rate of fluconazole-susceptible isolates was 80%, which appears to be a decrease compared to findings of previous studies, explained mainly by the higher frequency of C. glabrata. Using the species-specific breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values, the rate of voriconazole and posaconazole in vitro resistance was low (<2%). In the case of C. tropicalis, using the EUCAST procedure, the rate of azole resistance was around 20%. There was a correlation between the previous use of azoles and the presence of fluconazole-resistant isolates. Resistance to echinocandins was very rare (2%), and resistance to amphotericin B also was very uncommon. The sequencing of the hot spot (HS) regions from FKS1 or FKS2 genes in echinocandin-resistant isolates revealed previously described point mutations. The decrease in the susceptibility to fluconazole in Spanish isolates should be closely monitored in future studies.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandida tropicalisCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFungemiaHumansItraconazoleKetoconazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesSpainTriazolesAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsItraconazoleKetoconazoleposaconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID24366741
PMCPMC3957835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.