Considering alternative explanations for the associations among childhood adversity, childhood abuse, and adult sexual orientation: reply to Bailey and Bailey (2013) and Rind (2013).

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Comparing the Rates of Early Childhood Victimization across Sexual Orientations: Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Mostly Heterosexual.PloS one · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Genetic confounds in the study of sexual orientation: comment on Roberts, Glymour, and Koenen (2014).2014
• Comment on
  Does maltreatment in childhood affect sexual orientation in adulthood?2013
• Comment on
  Homosexual orientation-from nature, not abuse: A critique of Roberts, Glymour, and Koenen (2013).2013
• Comment on
  Poor instruments lead to poor inferences: Comment on Roberts, Glymour, and Koenen (2013).2013

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as