Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24366401›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2014

Improving mammography screening among the medically underserved.

Terry C Davis, Alfred Rademaker, Charles L Bennett, Michael S Wolf, Edson Carias, Cristalyn Reynolds, Dachao Liu, Connie L Arnold

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. State health disparities research in Rural America: Gaps and future directions in an era of COVID-19.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  15. The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on Mammography Screening in Iranian Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  16. Increasing Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural and Border Texas with Friend to Friend Plus Patient Navigation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Terry C DavisDepartment of Medicine and Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71130, USA, Tdavis1@lsuhsc.edu.
Alfred Rademaker
Charles L Bennett
Michael S Wolf
Edson Carias
Cristalyn Reynolds
Dachao Liu
Connie L Arnold
Northwestern University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LEONIDAS C. PLATANIAS · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Leigh Lamonica · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Health Literacy Intervention and Cancer ScreeningR01CA115869 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI DAVIS, TERRY C · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115869NCI NIH HHS R01- CA115869-05NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions designed to promote mammography in safety-net settings.

methodsA three-arm, quasi-experimental evaluation was conducted among eight federally qualified health clinics in predominately rural Louisiana. Mammography screening efforts included: 1) enhanced care, 2) health literacy-informed education of patients, and 3) education plus nurse support. Outcomes included mammography screening completion within 6 months and incremental cost-effectiveness.

resultsOverall, 1,181 female patients ages 40 and over who were eligible for routine mammography were recruited. Baseline screening rates were < 10%. Post intervention screening rates were 55.7% with enhanced care, 51.8% with health literacy-informed education and 65.8% with education and nurse support. After adjusting for race, marital status, self-efficacy and literacy, patients receiving health-literacy informed education were not more likely to complete mammographic screening than those receiving enhanced care; those additionally receiving nurse support were 1.37-fold more likely to complete mammographic screening than those receiving the brief education (95% Confidence Interval 1.08-1.74, p = 0.01). The incremental cost per additional women screened was $2,457 for literacy-informed education with nurse support over literacy-informed education alone.

conclusionsMammography rates were increased substantially over existing baseline rates in all three arms with the educational initiative, with nurse support and follow-up being the most effective option. However, it is not likely to be cost-effective or affordable in resource-limited clinics.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaRural PopulationAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLouisianaMammographyMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID24366401
PMCPMC3965756
OpenAlexW2087463352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.