Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24366357›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2014

The odontoid process: various configuration types in MR examinations.

Evangelos Perdikakis, Nikolaos Skoulikaris

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Os odontoideum and craniovertebral junction instability secondary to dystonia: case series and review of the literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Os odontoideum: A comprehensive review.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evangelos PerdikakisDepartment of Radiology, 412 General Military Hospital-212 Mobile Army Surgical Hospital, Terma Lefkou Pyrgou, 67100, Xanthi, Greece, perdikakis_ev@yahoo.gr.
Nikolaos Skoulikaris

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral developmental anomalies have been described with respect to the odontoid process. The purpose of the study was to describe the MR appearance of the odontoid process and to calculate the prevalence of its morphological variants. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 133 patients (85 males and 48 females, age range of 19-81 years, mean 39.5), examined within a 7-year period. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≤30 and >30-year-old. The morphology of the odontoid process was classified into type I: pyramidal tip and type II: ovoid or convex tip. The incidence of os odontoideum and os terminale and the presence of longitudinal cleft were also recorded. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

resultsType I was identified in 54 cases (40.6 %) and type II in 79 cases (59.4 %). Os odontoideum was recorded in one case (0.7 %), os terminale in 24 cases (18 %) and the presence of a longitudinal cleft (partial or complete) in 86 cases (64.7 %). Type I showed a higher prevalence in the ≤30 age group (p < 0.05). No differences were shown between sexes.

conclusionThe configuration types of odontoid process are reported herein. The clinical relevance of this morphological variation needs to be elucidated with further studies.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdontoid ProcessRadiographyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.