Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24366269›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2014

Preoperative consultations for medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Stephan R Thilen, Miriam M Treggiari, Jane M Lange, Elliott Lowy, Edward M Weaver, Duminda N Wijeysundera

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan R ThilenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Miriam M TreggiariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle2Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jane M LangeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Elliott LowyVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington5Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.
Edward M WeaverVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington6Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Duminda N WijeysunderaLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada8Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada9Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada10.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine Training GrantT32GM086270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tonya M Palermo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
CIHRNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086270NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM086270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceLow-risk elective surgical procedures are common, but there are no clear guidelines for when preoperative consultations are required. Such consultations may therefore represent a substantial discretionary service.

objectiveTo assess temporal trends, explanatory factors, and geographic variation for preoperative consultation in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing cataract surgery, a common low-risk elective procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsCohort study using a 5% national random sample of Medicare part B claims data including a cohort of 556,637 patients 66 years or older who underwent cataract surgery from 1995 to 2006. Temporal trends in consultations were evaluated within this entire cohort, whereas explanatory factors and geographic variation were evaluated within the 89,817 individuals who underwent surgery from 2005 to 2006. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Separately billed preoperative consultations (performed by family practitioners, general internists, pulmonologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, nurse practitioners, or anesthesiologists) within 42 days before index surgery.

resultsThe frequency of preoperative consultations increased from 11.3% in 1998 to 18.4% in 2006. Among individuals who underwent surgery in 2005 to 2006, hierarchical logistic regression modeling found several factors to be associated with preoperative consultation, including increased age (75-84 years vs 66-74 years: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.13]), race (African American race vs other: AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.65-0.78]), urban residence (urban residence vs isolated rural town: AOR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.49-1.81]), facility type (outpatient hospital vs ambulatory surgical facility: AOR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.15]), anesthesia provider (anesthesiologist vs non-medically directed nurse anesthetist: AOR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.10-1.24), and geographic region (Northeast vs South: AOR, 3.09 [95% CI, 2.33-4.10]). The burden of comorbidity was associated with consultation, but the effect size was small (<10%). Variation in frequency of consultation across hospital referral regions was substantial (median [range], 12% [0-69%]), even after accounting for differences in patient-level, anesthesia provider-level, and facility-level characteristics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Between 1995 and 2006, the frequency of preoperative consultation for cataract surgery increased substantially. Referrals for consultation seem to be primarily driven by nonmedical factors, with substantial geographic variation.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionPreoperative CareAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMedicareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24366269
PMCPMC4167873
OpenAlexW1975293499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.