Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2436609›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal1987

Preparation and characterization of nuclear-envelope vesicles from rat liver nuclei.

N Riedel, H Fasold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. GTP-binding proteins in rat liver nuclear envelopes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1990
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N Riedel
H Fasold
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a procedure for the preparation of sealed nuclear-envelope vesicles from rat liver nuclei. These vesicles are strikingly similar in their polypeptide composition when compared with those of nuclear envelopes prepared conventionally using deoxyribonuclease I. Subfractionation analysis by means of extraction with high salt and urea show that the components of the nuclear envelope, e.g. the pore-complex/lamina fraction, are present. The residual DNA content is only 1.5%, and typical preparations consist of about 80% vesicles, with the vesicular character of these envelopes shown by microscopic and biochemical studies. The vesicles can be obtained in high yield, are tight and stable for at least two days and are enriched in a nucleoside triphosphatase thought to be involved in nucleocytoplasmic transport processes. Because the vesicles are largely free of components of the nuclear interior, but retain properties of intact nuclei, we believe that they are a valuable model system to study nucleocytoplasmic transport. Although in transport studies with isolated nuclei interference from intranuclear events has to be considered, the nuclear-envelope vesicles provide the possibility of studying translocation alone. Furthermore, the less complex nature of these vesicles compared with whole nuclei should facilitate investigation of the components involved in the regulation of nuclear transport processes.

Indexed as

Nuclear EnvelopeAnimalsCell FractionationDeoxyribonucleasesElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHeparinMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastNucleoside-TriphosphatasePhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesRatsRats, Inbred StrainsRNADeoxyribonucleasesHeparinNucleoside-TriphosphatasePhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesRNA

Identifiers

PMID2436609
PMCPMC1147544
OpenAlexW1754359083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.