Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24366029›Full record

ReviewNature cell biology2014

Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Michelle K Zeman, Karlene A Cimprich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,313 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,313citing papers in PubMed
40.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,313 citing papers in PubMed, 2,023 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome stability disrupted by the circRBM39(4,5,6)-RPA2 axis represses breast tumorigenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1,253 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle K ZemanDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Karlene A CimprichDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Leveraging innovative technologies in basic and clinical cancer researchT32CA009302 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAURA D ATTARDI, Aaron M Newman · 1985 to 2026
$19.1M
Regulation of the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES016486 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CIMPRICH, KARLENE A · 2007 to 2025
$6.2M
Mechanisms Linking Genome Stability to RNA MetabolismR01GM100489 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CIMPRICH, KARLENE A · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016486NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication stress is a complex phenomenon that has serious implications for genome stability, cell survival and human disease. Generation of aberrant replication fork structures containing single-stranded DNA activates the replication stress response, primarily mediated by the kinase ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related). Along with its downstream effectors, ATR stabilizes and helps to restart stalled replication forks, avoiding the generation of DNA damage and genome instability. Understanding this response may be key to diagnosing and treating human diseases caused by defective responses to replication stress.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationStress, PhysiologicalDiseaseEukaryotic CellsHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID24366029
PMCPMC4354890
OpenAlexW2040860750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.