Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24365967›Full record

ReviewChannels (Austin, Tex.)2014

The bile acid-sensitive ion channel (BASIC), the ignored cousin of ASICs and ENaC.

Dominik Wiemuth, Marc Assmann, Stefan Gründer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Channels (Austin, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epithelial NaComprehensive Physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Epithelial Sodium Channel-An Underestimated Drug Target.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Murine epithelial sodium (NaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominik WiemuthInstitute of Physiology; RWTH University Aachen; Aachen, Germany.
Marc AssmannInstitute of Physiology; RWTH University Aachen; Aachen, Germany.
Stefan GründerInstitute of Physiology; RWTH University Aachen; Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DECzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DEG/ENaC gene family of ion channels is characterized by a high degree of structural similarity and an equally high degree of diversity concerning the physiological function. In humans and rodents, the DEG/ENaC family comprises 2 main subgroups: the subunits of the epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC) and the subunits of the acid sensing ion channels (ASICs). The bile acid-sensitive channel (BASIC), previously known as BLINaC or INaC, represents a third subgroup within the DEG/ENaC family. Although BASIC was identified more than a decade ago, very little is known about its physiological function. Recent progress in the characterization of this neglected member of the DEG/ENaC family, which is summarized in this focused review, includes the discovery of surprising species differences, its pharmacological characterization, and the identification of bile acids as putative natural activators.

Indexed as

Acid Sensing Ion ChannelsAnimalsBile Acids and SaltsCloning, MolecularEpithelial Sodium ChannelsHumansAcid Sensing Ion ChannelsBile Acids and SaltsEpithelial Sodium Channelsacid-sensing ion channelASICBASICbile acidBLINaCcholangiocyteDEG/ENaCENaCepithelial Na+ channel

Identifiers

PMID24365967
PMCPMC4048340
OpenAlexW2057224175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.