Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24364541›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2014

Metabolomic characterization of nipple aspirate fluid by (1)H NMR spectroscopy and GC-MS.

Gregory D Tredwell, Jessica A Miller, H-H Sherry Chow, Patricia A Thompson, Hector C Keun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A Reproducibility Crisis for Clinical Metabolomics Studies.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. MR spectroscopy in breast cancer metabolomics.Analytical science advances · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Metabolomic profiling of breast tumors using ductal fluid.International journal of oncology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory D TredwellDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London , SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Jessica A Miller
H-H Sherry Chow
Patricia A Thompson
Hector C Keun
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Arizona Cancer CenterUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Cancer Prevention and Control Translational ResearchR25CA078447 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALBERTS, DAVID SAMUEL · 1998 to 2014
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R25 CA078447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) is a noninvasively obtained biofluid from the duct openings of the breast. NAF components are constantly secreted, metabolized, and reabsorbed by the epithelial lining of the lactiferous ducts of the breast. NAF has been studied as a potential breast tissue surrogate for the discovery of novel breast cancer risk, early detection, and treatment response biomarkers. We report the first unsupervised metabolite characterization of nipple aspirate fluid using NMR and GC-MS using convenience samples previously collected from four premenopausal and four postmenopausal women. A total of 38 metabolites were identified using the two analytical techniques, including amino acids, organic acids, fatty acids, and carbohydrates. Analytical reproducibility of metabolites in NAF by GC-MS was high across different extraction and analysis days. Overall, 31 metabolites had a coefficient of variation below 20%. By GC-MS, there were eight metabolites unique to NAF, 19 unique to plasma, and 24 shared metabolites. Correlative analysis of shared metabolites between matched NAF and plasma samples from pre- and postmenopausal women shows almost no correlations, with the exception being lactic acid, which was significantly negatively correlated (R(2) = 0.57; P = 0.03). These results suggest that NAF is metabolically distinct from plasma and that the application of metabolomic strategies may be useful for future studies investigating breast cancer risk and intervention response biomarkers.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsBody FluidsFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNipplesPostmenopausePremenopause

Identifiers

PMID24364541
PMCPMC4423791
OpenAlexW2312635392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.