ArticlePsychology and aging2013
Age-related changes in associative memory for emotional and nonemotional integrative representations.
Article in Psychology and aging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- I remember it like it was yesterday: Age-related differences in the subjective experience of remembering.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Review
- Expanding and retracting from the self: Gains and costs in switching self-associations.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2016Article
- Memory for positive, negative and neutral events in younger and older adults: Does emotion influence binding in event memory?Cognition & emotion · 2016Article
- Oversimplification in the study of emotional memory.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Events often include novel combinations of items. Sometimes, through the process of integration, we experience and remember these items as parts of a whole rather than as separate entities. Recent research with younger adults has demonstrated that successfully integrating 2 nonemotional items at encoding, instead of imagining them separately, produces a disproportionately larger associative memory benefit than integrating an emotional and a nonemotional item. In the first study to examine whether age and emotion interact to influence integration, we used 2 measures of integrative success-the ability to successfully retrieve integrations, measured through associative cued recall, and the ability to successfully generate integrated representations at encoding, measured through self report. The cued-recall results (Experiments 1 and 2) revealed that the emotional content of the word pairs interacts to influence the effect of integration on older adults' associative memory, but in the opposite direction of younger adults: Older adults showed no associative retrieval benefit of integration over nonintegration for nonemotional pairs, but they showed a significant integrative benefit for emotional pairs. We also demonstrated (Experiment 2) that encoding time interacts with emotion and integration in different ways for older and younger adults: Putting younger adults under time pressure reduced their success in generating integrated representations at encoding for nonemotional pairs, whereas for older adults it disrupted their ability to generate integrated representations for emotional pairs. We discuss possible age-related differences in the processes used to create emotional and nonemotional integrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.