Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24364398›Full record

ArticlePsychology and aging2013

Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.

Hillary G Mullet, Michael K Scullin, Theodore J Hess, Rachel B Scullin, Kathleen M Arnold, Gilles O Einstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and aging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Age-related changes in neural mechanisms of prospective memory.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Regularity effect in prospective memory during aging.Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology · 2016
    Article
  13. Dual pathways to prospective remembering.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hillary G MulletDepartment of Psychology, Furman University.
Michael K ScullinDepartment of Psychology, Furman University.
Theodore J HessDepartment of Psychology, Furman University.
Rachel B ScullinDepartment of Psychology, Furman University.
Kathleen M ArnoldDepartment of Psychology, Furman University.
Gilles O EinsteinDepartment of Psychology, Furman University.

Funding

Training At The Interface of Psychology, Neuroscience, and GeneticsT32GM081739 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA · 2007 to 2016
$2.1M
The Role of Sleep in Cognitive Declines in Normal Aging and Mild Cognitive ImpairF32AG041543 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SCULLIN, MICHAEL K · 2011 to 2014
$149k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG041543NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM081739-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined whether normal aging spares or compromises cue-driven spontaneous retrieval processes that support prospective remembering. In Experiment 1, young and older adults performed prospective-memory tasks that required either strategic monitoring processes for retrieval (nonfocal) or for which participants relied on spontaneous retrieval processes (focal). We found age differences for nonfocal, but not focal, prospective-memory performance. Experiments 2 and 3 used an intention-interference paradigm in which participants were asked to perform a prospective-memory task (e.g., press "Q" when the word money appears) in the context of an image-rating task and were then told to suspend their prospective-memory intention until after completing an intervening lexical-decision task. During the lexical-decision task, we presented the exact prospective-memory cue (e.g., money; Experiments 2 and 3) or a semantically related lure (e.g., wallet; Experiment 3), and we inferred spontaneous retrieval from slowed lexical-decision responses to these items relative to matched control items. Young and older adults showed significant slowing when the exact prospective-memory cue was presented. Only young adults, however, showed significant slowing to the semantically related lure items. Collectively, these results partially support the multiprocess theory prediction that aging spares spontaneous retrieval processes. Spontaneous retrieval processes may become less sensitive with aging, such that older adults are less likely to respond to cues that do not exactly match their encoded targets.

Indexed as

CuesIntentionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMemory, EpisodicMental RecallMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24364398
PMCPMC12327648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.