ArticleCurrent zoology2013
Differentially-expressed
Article in Current zoology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduced adult stem cell fate specification led to eye reduction in cave planarians.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Light wavelength modulates search behavior performance in zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Eye Degeneration and Loss of otx5b Expression in the Cavefish Sinocyclocheilus tileihornes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2019Article
- Remnants of ancestral larval eyes in an eyeless mollusk? Molecular characterization of photoreceptors in the scaphopodEvoDevo · 2019Article
- Brain of the blind: transcriptomics of the golden-line cavefish brain.Current zoology · 2018Article
- A Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Development in Two Astyanax Cavefish Populations.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- A new model army: Emerging fish models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Eye degeneration is a common troglomorphic character of cave-dwelling organisms. Comparing the morphology and molecular biology of cave species and their close surface relatives is a powerful tool for studying regressive eye evolution and other adaptive phenotypes. We compared two co-occurring and closely-related species of the fish genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.