Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24363436›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2014

Antibody response to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 among healthcare personnel receiving trivalent inactivated vaccine: effect of prior monovalent inactivated vaccine.

Manjusha Gaglani, Sarah Spencer, Sarah Ball, Juhee Song, Allison Naleway, Emily Henkle, Sam Bozeman, Sue Reynolds, Wendy Sessions, Kathy Hancock and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Randomised immunogenicity trial comparing 2019-2020 recombinant and egg-based influenza vaccines among frequently vaccinated healthcare personnel in Israel.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Prior Season Vaccination on Current Season Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network, 2012-2013 Through 2017-2018.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016-2017 Season.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Manjusha GaglaniDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases.
Sarah Spencer
Sarah Ball
Juhee Song
Allison Naleway
Emily Henkle
Sam Bozeman
Sue Reynolds
Wendy Sessions
Kathy Hancock
Mark Thompson
Abt Global (United States) · USKaiser Permanente · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USPediatric Infectious Diseases Society · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew data are available on the immunogenicity of repeated annual doses of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-containing vaccines.

methodsWe enrolled healthcare personnel (HCP) in direct patient care during the autumn of 2010 at 2 centers with voluntary immunization. We verified the receipt of A(H1N1)pdm09-containing monovalent inactivated influenza vaccine (MIIV) and 2010-2011 trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV). We performed hemagglutination inhibition antibody (HI) assays on preseason, post-TIV, and end-of-season serum samples. We compared the proportion of HCPs with HI titer ≥ 40 against A(H1N1)pdm09 per receipt of prior-season MIIV, current-season TIV, both, or neither.

resultsAt preseason (n = 1417), HI ≥ 40 was significantly higher among those who received MIIV (34%) vs those who did not (14%) (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.72-3.81). At post-TIV (n = 865), HI ≥ 40 was lower among HCP who received MIIV and TIV (66%) than among those receiving only TIV (85%) (ARR, 0.93 [95% CI, .84-.997]). At end-of-season (n = 1254), HI ≥ 40 was 40% among those who received both MIIV and TIV and 67% among those receiving only TIV (ARR, 0.76 [95% CI, .65-.88]), 52% among those who received MIIV only, and 12% among those receiving neither.

conclusionsHCP immunization programs should consider effects of host immune response and vaccine antigenic distance on immunogenicity of repeated annual doses of influenza vaccines.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationAntibody SpecificityCohort StudiesFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated2009 influenza pandemic H1N1healthcare workershemagglutination inhibition antibodyinfluenza vaccineinfluenza vaccine immunogenicity or response

Identifiers

PMID24363436
PMCPMC7313942
OpenAlexW2083627705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.