Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24363355›Full record

ReviewEpidemiologic reviews2014

Epidemiologic tools to study the influence of environmental factors on fecundity and pregnancy-related outcomes.

Rémy Slama, Ferran Ballester, Maribel Casas, Sylvaine Cordier, Merete Eggesbø, Carmen Iniguez, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Claire Philippat, Sylvie Rey, Stéphanie Vandentorren and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epidemiologic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Does Older Age Modify Associations between Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Fecundability?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: implications for human health.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epigenomic programing: a future way to health?Microbial ecology in health and disease · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rémy SlamaAbbreviations: PROM, premature rupture of the fetal membranes; TTP, time to pregnancy.
Ferran Ballester
Maribel Casas
Sylvaine Cordier
Merete Eggesbø
Carmen Iniguez
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Claire Philippat
Sylvie Rey
Stéphanie Vandentorren
Martine Vrijheid
Inserm · FRUniversité Joseph Fourier · FRAvenir Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse pregnancy outcomes entail a large health burden for the mother and offspring; a part of it might be avoided by better understanding the role of environmental factors in their etiology. Our aims were to review the assessment tools to characterize fecundity troubles and pregnancy-related outcomes in human populations and their sensitivity to environmental factors. For each outcome, we reviewed the possible study designs, main sources of bias, and their suggested cures. In terms of study design, for most pregnancy outcomes, cohorts with recruitment early during or even before pregnancy allow efficient characterization of pregnancy-related events, time-varying confounders, and in utero exposures that may impact birth outcomes and child health. Studies on congenital anomalies require specific designs, assessment of anomalies in medical pregnancy terminations, and, for congenital anomalies diagnosed postnatally, follow-up during several months after birth. Statistical analyses should take into account environmental exposures during the relevant time windows; survival models are an appropriate approach for fecundity, fetal loss, and gestational duration/preterm delivery. Analysis of gestational duration could distinguish pregnancies according to delivery induction (and possibly pregnancy-related conditions). In conclusion, careful design and analysis are required to better characterize environmental effects on human reproduction.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignBirth WeightCausalityCongenital AbnormalitiesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleFertilityHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesEnvironmental Pollutantsbirth weightcohort studiescongenital abnormalitiesenvironmentfecundityfetal membranes, premature rupturepregnancypreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID24363355
PMCPMC3873845
OpenAlexW2171994751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.