ArticleParasitology research2014
Evaluation of the effect of miltefosine on Trichomonas vaginalis.
Article in Parasitology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trichomonas vaginalis Drug Targets and Their Role in Drug Discovery and Development.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
- Unusual Cell Structures and Organelles inMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Antibacterial and anti-trichomunas characteristics of local landraces of Lawsonia inermis L.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2022Article
- Oral miltefosine for refractoryAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2019Article
- Challenges and Persistent Questions in the Treatment of Trichomoniasis.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2017Review
- Trichomoniasis - are we giving the deserved attention to the most common non-viral sexually transmitted disease worldwide?Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2016Review
- Genome mining offers a new starting point for parasitology research.Parasitology research · 2015Review
- Anti-Trichomonas vaginalis activity from triterpenoid derivatives.Parasitology research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trichomonas vaginalis causes trichomoniasis in humans, a sexually transmitted disease commonly treated with metronidazole (MTZ). MTZ is known to cause undesirable side effects, and MTZ-resistant parasites have been reported. Thus, the development of an alternative treatment is desirable. Miltefosine (MLT) is an alkylphosphocholine synthetic lipid analogue that displays antiparasitic activity against Leishmania, Trypanosoma cruzi, Entamoeba histolytica, Acanthamoeba spp., Giardia lamblia, T. vaginalis and some fungi. Moreover, it has been used for oral treatment of visceral leishmaniosis in several countries. Here, we analysed the MLT-induced antiproliferative effect on T. vaginalis as well its effect on the fine structure and viability of the parasite. We observed a dose-dependent effect with an IC50 of 14.5 and 20 μM after 24 and 48 h, respectively. Furthermore, reversibility assays demonstrated that new incubations were necessary in order to maintain the antiproliferative effect. Ultrastructural analyses demonstrated that MLT induced several alterations, including the appearance of wrinkled and rounded cells, membrane blebbing, intense vacuolization and nuclear condensation, all indicative of cell death by apoptosis. In addition, the quantitative analyses of the viability assays using combined markers of live and dead cells demonstrated that treatment with the IC50 concentration of MLT significantly reduced the number of viable parasites compared with untreated cells. Taken together, these observations suggest that MLT is a promising compound for the treatment of trichomoniasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.