Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24362919›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014

The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre.

F Iacono, G F Raspugli, D Bruni, G Filardo, S Zaffagnini, W F Luetzow, M Lo Presti, I Akkawi, G M Marcheggiani Muccioli, M Marcacci

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is a "sulcus cut" technique effective for determining the level of distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2014
    Article
  17. The adductor ratio: a new tool for joint line reconstruction in revision TKA.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F Iacono2nd Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy, f.iacono@biomec.ior.it.
G F Raspugli
D Bruni
G Filardo
S Zaffagnini
W F Luetzow
M Lo Presti
I Akkawi
G M Marcheggiani Muccioli
M Marcacci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe restoration of the normal joint line (JL) is important both in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the assessment of the femoro-tibial JL is still controversial. A strong correlation between femoral width (FW) and distance from adductor tubercle (AT) to JL was found on radiographs, with a ratio of 0.54. The hypothesis was that this ratio was applicable also in the surgical theatre by using measurements obtained intra-operatively with a caliper.

methodsFemoral width, AT to JL distance and the RATIO between AT to JL distance and FW of 40 patients who underwent TKA were measured on radiograph and intra-operatively. Bland-Altman agreement tests with repeated measurements and linear regression analysis were used. The ratio was used to estimate the distance between JL and AT.

resultsThe AT to JL distance/FW ratio calculated with linear regression resulted 0.54 for radiographic measurements and 0.53 for intra-operative measurements. There was no difference (0.009 ± 0.03) between the calculated ratios on radiographic and intra-operative measurements, and the correlation between intra-operative and radiographic measurements was 0.5 (p = 0.0016).

conclusionsThis study shows that the validity of the radiographic method which uses an AT to JL distance/FW ratio to determine the level of the JL is confirmed also when using intra-operatively acquired measurements. Thus, this ratio represents a reliable tool to determine the JL level even in challenging prosthetic revision cases when the anatomical JL is missing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBody Weights and MeasuresFemaleFemurHumansIntraoperative PeriodKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePreoperative CareRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsTibia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.