Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24362841›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

PennSeq: accurate isoform-specific gene expression quantification in RNA-Seq by modeling non-uniform read distribution.

Yu Hu, Yichuan Liu, Xianyun Mao, Cheng Jia, Jane F Ferguson, Chenyi Xue, Muredach P Reilly, Hongzhe Li, Mingyao Li

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Strategies for eQTL mapping in allopolyploid organisms.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu HuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA and Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Yichuan Liu
Xianyun Mao
Cheng Jia
Jane F Ferguson
Chenyi Xue
Muredach P Reilly
Hongzhe Li
Mingyao Li
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Elucidation of Tissue-Specific Transcriptomic Profiles in Cardiometabolic DiseaseR01HL113147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2012 to 2022
$6.8M
Translational Studies of ADAMTS7 a Novel GWAS Locus for Coronary AtherosclerosisR01HL111694 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
Glycomics of Heart and Lung Disease in the Genomic EraU01HL108636 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2011 to 2014
$2.4M
Developing Statistical Methods for Disease Gene DiscoveryR01HG004517 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHUN, LI, MINGYAO · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Cardiometabolic DiseaseK24HL107643 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2011 to 2020
$1.4M
Statistical Methods for Next-Generation Sequence DataR01GM097505 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, HONGZHE · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
Statistical Methods for Gene Mapping Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG005854 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2010 to 2012
$978k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG004517NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005854NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL107643NHLBI NIH HHS K24HL107643NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL111694NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113147NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL108636NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM097505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correctly estimating isoform-specific gene expression is important for understanding complicated biological mechanisms and for mapping disease susceptibility genes. However, estimating isoform-specific gene expression is challenging because various biases present in RNA-Seq (RNA sequencing) data complicate the analysis, and if not appropriately corrected, can affect isoform expression estimation and downstream analysis. In this article, we present PennSeq, a statistical method that allows each isoform to have its own non-uniform read distribution. Instead of making parametric assumptions, we give adequate weight to the underlying data by the use of a non-parametric approach. Our rationale is that regardless what factors lead to non-uniformity, whether it is due to hexamer priming bias, local sequence bias, positional bias, RNA degradation, mapping bias or other unknown reasons, the probability that a fragment is sampled from a particular region will be reflected in the aligned data. This empirical approach thus maximally reflects the true underlying non-uniform read distribution. We evaluate the performance of PennSeq using both simulated data with known ground truth, and using two real Illumina RNA-Seq data sets including one with quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction measurements. Our results indicate superior performance of PennSeq over existing methods, particularly for isoforms demonstrating severe non-uniformity. PennSeq is freely available for download at http://sourceforge.net/projects/pennseq.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, StatisticalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA IsoformsSequence Analysis, RNAStatistics, NonparametricRNA Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID24362841
PMCPMC3919567
OpenAlexW2094492214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.