Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24362758›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2014

Cerebellar loops: a review of the nucleocortical pathway.

Brenda D Houck, Abigail L Person

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cerebellar Functions Beyond Movement and Learning.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Cerebellar Cortex.Annual review of neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brenda D HouckDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12800 East 19th Ave RC-1 North, Campus Box 8307, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Abigail L Person

Funding

Sensorimotor integration in mammalian cerebellumR01NS084996 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PERSON, ABIGAIL L · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084996NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084996-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback pathways are a common circuit motif in vertebrate brains. Reciprocal interconnectivity is seen between the cerebral cortex and thalamus as well as between basal ganglia structures, for example. Here, we review the literature on the nucleocortical pathway, a feedback pathway from the cerebellar nuclei to the cerebellar cortex, which has been studied anatomically but has remained somewhat obscure. This review covers the work examining this pathway on a number of levels, ranging from its existence in numerous species, its organization within cerebellar circuits, its cellular composition, and a discussion of its potential roles in motor control. Recent interest in cerebellar modular organization raises the profile of this neglected cerebellar pathway, and it is hoped that this review will consolidate knowledge gained over several decades of research into a useful format, spurring new investigations into this evolutionarily conserved pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiCerebral CortexHumansNeural PathwaysNeurons

Identifiers

PMID24362758
PMCPMC4207368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.