SynthesisMolecular biology reports2014
Meta-analysis on the association of nucleotide excision repair gene XPD A751C variant and cancer susceptibility among Indian population.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Xeroderma Pigmentosum: A Genetic Condition Skin Cancer Correlated-A Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- No evidence of correlation between p53 codon 72 G > C gene polymorphism and cancer risk in Indian population: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- XPD-The Lynchpin of NER: Molecule, Gene, Polymorphisms, and Role in Colorectal Carcinogenesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2018Review
- Article
- Lack of association between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymorphism A751C (A>C) in XPD gene has shown susceptibility to many cancers in Indian population; however the results of these studies are inconclusive. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to estimate the association between XPD A751C polymorphism and overall cancer susceptibility. We quantitavely synthesized all published studies of the association between XPD A751C polymorphism and cancer risk. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % CI were estimated for allele contrast, homozygous, heterozygous, dominant and recessive genetic model. A total of thirteen studies including 3,599 controls and 3,087 cancer cases were identified and analyzed. Overall significant results were observed for C allele carrier (C vs. A: p = 0.001; OR 1.372, 95 % CI 1.172-1.605) variant homozygous (CC vs. AA: p = 0.001; OR 1.691, 95 % CI 1.280-2.233) and heterozygous (AC vs. AA: p = 0.001; OR 1.453, 95 % CI 1.215-1.737) genotypes. Similarly dominant (CC+AC vs. AA: p = 0.001; OR 1.512, 95 % CI 1.244-1.839) and recessive (CC vs. AA+AC: p = 0.001; OR 1.429, 95 % CI 1.151-1.774) genetic models also demonstrated risk of developing cancer. This meta-analysis suggested that XPD A751C polymorphism likely contribute to cancer susceptibility in Indian population. Further studies about gene-gene and gene-environment interactions are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.