Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24362040›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Genomic instability in pluripotent stem cells: implications for clinical applications.

Suzanne E Peterson, Jeanne F Loring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Organoids of liver diseases: From bench to bedside.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suzanne E PetersonFrom the Department of Chemical Physiology and Center for Regenerative Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037.
Jeanne F Loring

Funding

Autism iPSCs for Studying Function and Dysfunction in Human Neural DevelopmentR33MH087925 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI LORING, JEANNE F · 2011 to 2012
$942k
Dopaminergic Neurons from Pluripotent Stem Cells for Substance Abuse ResearchR21DA032975 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI LORING, JEANNE F, SANNA, PIETRO P · 2011 to 2012
$521k
NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR001250NIDA NIH HHS 1R21 DA032975-01NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA032975NIMH NIH HHS 5R33 MH087925-04NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH087925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are known to acquire genomic changes as they proliferate and differentiate. Despite concerns that these changes will compromise the safety of hPSC-derived cell therapy, there is currently scant evidence linking the known hPSC genomic abnormalities with malignancy. For the successful use of hPSCs for clinical applications, we will need to learn to distinguish between innocuous genomic aberrations and those that may cause tumors. To minimize any effects of acquired mutations on cell therapy, we strongly recommend that cells destined for transplant be monitored throughout their preparation using a high-resolution method such as SNP genotyping.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalCarcinogenesisClinical Trials as TopicGenetic VariationGenomic InstabilityHumansPluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationCell TherapyEmbryonic Stem CellGenomicsInduced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID24362040
PMCPMC3931019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.